Gerrard Geldenhuis wrote: >> Something else occurred to me. If you have a shared/replicated NetscapeRoot >> database and lets say 12 servers over 3 datacentres, 6 providers and 6 >> consumers. >You will end up with 12 servers in a multimaster group for the >> netscaperoot database but only 6 servers in a multi master setup for the >> userdata database. That >seems quite a lot of masters for NetscapeRoot. Is >> that considered to many and/or is there any recommendations when having that >> many servers? >> > > To have all changes only 1 server away you need 28 replication agreements for > 6 servers. Well at least for the userdb, 12 servers requieres LOT more > replication agreements if you want changes replicating immediately to all > servers. 24 Agreements if you are replicating sequentially. A lot more if you > want all servers to replicate to all servers. > I guess one can live with NetscapeRoot changes taking a few minutes to arrive > everywhere. > NetscapeRoot changes are not frequent and are usually small. > Regards > > ________________________________________________________________________ > In order to protect our email recipients, Betfair Group use SkyScan from > MessageLabs to scan all Incoming and Outgoing mail for viruses. > > ________________________________________________________________________ > -- > 389 users mailing list > 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users >
-- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
