Tim via users writes:

On Thu, 2025-11-13 at 08:12 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Conceptually, a complicated technical ecosystem like SELinux can only
> meaningfully scale if the barrier of entry is low enough for the upstream
> sources to be able to easily supply the SELinux policy, as part of the
> package.
>
> Originally, it was expected that SELinux will become very popular and take
> over the Linux scene by storm. It was thought that there wasn't much need to
> provide a rich set of resources for learning how to use SELinux. After all,
> everyone will simply have to deal with it, if they wish to play with the big
> boys.

That a scheme dreamt up by some American three-letter-organisation with
a bad reputation wouldn't be popular, or user-friendly...  Who woulda
thunk?!

I completely forgot about that juicy nugget.

Does SELinux actually do anything beneficial for the average (*) person
with a PC that cannot be remotely contacted?  Potentially it could, but
does it "actually"?  And could other, simpler, schemes do the job just
as well?

* The average person has no publicly responding servers.  Is at home,
not on public WiFi.  And since the end of dial-up, is behind a router
which doesn't forward unexpected connections though it to your PC.

Well, the argument for that is that SELinux helps to mitigate and contain the damage. Even if a given application falls to an exploit, the resulting fallout gets limited by SELinux. That's something that a basic end-user can certainly benefit from. I'll buy that.

SELinux's main problem is its cost vs benefit ratio. The above benefit matters, but it only benefits a very, very small number of Linux distributions. And the cost is significant, insofar as required investment of time and effort. The cost/benefit ratio is lousy.

Attachment: pgpBwOG3TtHuS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to