On 10/23/25 4:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 10/23/25 3:13 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,

What is this all about?

If I try to remove
    libjxl-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64

it removes 3 GB of system files and trashes me (don't
ask how I know)

-T

# dnf -y --releasever=43 --best update

Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories loaded.
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: cannot install both libjxl-1:0.11.1-5.fc43.x86_64 from fedora and libjxl-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 from @System    - installed package jxl-pixbuf-loader-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - installed package jxl-pixbuf-loader-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.10(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - installed package jxl-pixbuf-loader-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl_threads.so.0.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - installed package jxl-pixbuf-loader-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl_threads.so.0.10(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - cannot install the best update candidate for package libjxl-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64
   - problem with installed package
  Problem 2: cannot install both libjxl-1:0.11.1-5.fc43.x86_64 from fedora and libjxl-1:0.10.4-1.fc41.x86_64 from @System    - package SDL2_image-2.8.8-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libjxl.so.0.11()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - package SDL2_image-2.8.8-2.fc43.x86_64 from fedora requires libjxl.so.0.11(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - installed package webkit2gtk4.0-2.46.5-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - installed package webkit2gtk4.0-2.46.5-1.fc41.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.10(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed    - cannot install the best update candidate for package SDL2_image-2.8.8-1.fc41.x86_64
   - problem with installed package
You can try to add to command line:
   --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates

<editorial comment>  AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!! </editorial comment>

And it breaks gimp and inkscape too.  I must have them back !!!

# dnf install gimp inkscape --skip-broken
same libjxl errors as post above
...
Package                  Arch    Version                  Repository Size
Skipping packages with conflicts:
  libjxl                  x86_64  1:0.11.1-5.fc43          fedora  3.1 MiB
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
  GraphicsMagick          x86_64  1.3.45-5.fc43            fedora  5.1 MiB
  GraphicsMagick-c++      x86_64  1.3.45-5.fc43            fedora 506.5 KiB
  gimp                    x86_64  2:3.0.4-8.fc43           fedora 104.2 MiB
  inkscape                x86_64  1.4.2-7.fc43             fedora 146.0 MiB
  inkscape-libs           x86_64  1.4.2-7.fc43             fedora 25.1 MiB

Nothing to do.


Figured it out:

rpm told me the problem was jxl-pixbuf-loader, not dnf

Fedora 43: libjxl blocks DNF install of gimp, inkscape, zbarimg, etc

[1] download libjxl from rpmfind.net
https://rpmfind.net/linux/fedora/linux/updates/testing/43/Everything/x86_64/Packages/l/libjxl-0.11.1-6.fc43.x86_64.rpm

[2] remove jxl-pixbuf-loader
       # dnf remove jxl-pixbuf-loader

[3] install libjxl you just downloaded
       # rpm -ivh libjxl-0.11.1-6.fc43.x86_64.rpm


<additional editorial comment>  AAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!! </editorial comment>

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to