On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 4:56 PM Beartooth via users < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 1:15 PM I Beartooth via users > <[email protected]> wrote about the troubles with curl on > three machines all running F42. > > < https://cybernews.com/security/curl-maintainer-stenberg-says-ai-help-fix-dozens-of-bugs/ > Actually getting robust fixes takes time -- it should not be surprising that there are problems, and details of the bugs should not be published until fixes are tested and widely available. It would not be surprising if some bugs depend on the hardware and 3rd party libraries. > I'm still running F42 on the same three machines, seven weeks > later. Routine daily dnf upgrades have since fixed each of them at least > once -- and broken the upgrading process on each at least once. <sigh> > > The following rpm -q is the same on all three: > > $ rpm -q kernel > kernel-6.16.10-200.fc42.x86_64 > kernel-6.16.11-200.fc42.x86_64 > kernel-6.16.12-200.fc42.x86_64 > > Currently two machines accept upgrades with no trouble. And one > fails to the curl trouble every time. > Not sure what you mean, but for failed updates we need to see details I have Fedora on 4 systems and updates sometimes differ, likely due to delays populating mirror sites. -- George N. White III
-- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
