On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 2:48 PM home user via users
<users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Is there a 1-to-1 correspondence between "drive" and "volume".  In other
> words, each drive corresponds to one and only volume, and each volume
> corresponds to one and only one drive?

No, there is not.  A "volume" is a logical entity, a "drive" is a
more-or-less[1] physical entity.  It also depends on context[2].
A drive can be directly formatted with a file system at which time it
would be considered a volume.
A drive can be partitioned.  A partition can be formatted with a file
system at which time it would be considered a volume.  Sometimes the
partition itself is referred to as a volume.
One or more drives and/or partitions can be formatted as an LVM
Physical Volume (PV).  Within LVM you would have Volume Groups (VGs),
and within the VGs you would have Logical Volumes (LVs).  Each LV
would be a volume.
Other volume managers such as btrfs and zfs have similar concepts to LVM.
A RAID set is a volume typically created from multiple drives, but it
could also be constructed from multiple partitions.  The RAID volume
is presented to the system as a drive.

So a drive can have one or more volumes, and a single volume can exist
across one or more drives.

[1] I say more-or-less because of the RAID case, and also because a
"drive" could also be a virtual disk for a VM.
[2] RAID provides a good example - from the RAID context multiple
drives/partitions are used to create a volume; from the OS context the
RAID volume is a drive.
-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to