Re: Formatted Final Output from dnf5 update

[Stephen Morris]

On 18/12/24 00:22, Will McDonald wrote:

On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 12:19, Tim Evans <tkev...@tkevans.com> wrote:

    Apparently, I'm not describing this well enough.  At the very end
    of a
    run of the old dnf (that is, now 'dnf4 update') there is a nicely
    formatted little report printed.  Looks like this, in context:

       Cleanup          : qadwaitadecorations-qt5-0.1.6-2.fc41.x86_64
       21/22
       Running scriptlet: gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
       22/22
       Cleanup          : gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
       22/22
       Running scriptlet: gnome-settings-daemon-47.1-1.fc41.x86_64
       22/22

    Upgraded:
       gnome-settings-daemon-47.2-2.fc41.x86_64
       kf6-filesystem-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       kf6-kguiaddons-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       kf6-kwindowsystem-6.9.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       nspr-4.36.0-2.fc41.x86_64
       nss-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       nss-softokn-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       nss-softokn-freebl-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       nss-sysinit-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       nss-util-3.107.0-1.fc41.x86_64
       qadwaitadecorations-qt5-0.1.6-3.fc41.x86_64


    Complete!

    Compare this to the mess you've quoted.


Have you considered reporting/requesting this in the upstream project?

Bear in mind Fedora aggregates & integrates multiple projects. There are a few project maintainers on the list but your voice might be more clearly heard upstream: https://github.com/orgs/rpm-software-management/projects/4/views/1?filterQuery=summary

There's one backlog item around upgrade summary being too wide, but as you've said, that's not your issue: https://github.com/orgs/rpm-software-management/projects/4/views/1?filterQuery=summary&pane=issue&itemId=34740133&issue=rpm-software-management%7Cdnf5%7C785 <https://github.com/orgs/rpm-software-management/projects/4/views/1?filterQuery=summary&pane=issue&itemId=34740133&issue=rpm-software-management%7Cdnf5%7C785>

I can't see any existing issues requesting reinstituting the behaviour you want: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf5/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+summary

So you might be best kicking off that upstream discussion directly with the maintainers?

regards,
Steve

I don't remember ever seeing that sort of final display from dnf4. Was there specific options used that produced that?

OpenPGP_0x1EBE7C07B0F7242C.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue