On 11/3/24 16:12, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Did an upgrade from Fedora 40 to 41 and everything went well
except for WINEHQ?
The Fedora 40 had the 9.20 version installed, but after the upgrade
the WINEHQ (winehq-devel) was changed to 9.17??
So, not clear why that happened. Believe is mentioned 8 packages
needed downgrading, but didn't note what they were. Didn't use the
alloweasing or other options.
After the upgrade running dnf upgrade comes out with this.
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
wine-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Problem 2: package winehq-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
requires wine-devel = 1:9.20-1.1, but none of the providers can be
installed
- cannot install the best update candidate for package
winehq-devel-1:9.17-1.1.x86_64
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavcodec.so.60(LIBAVCODEC_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavformat.so.60(LIBAVFORMAT_60)(64bit)
needed by wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58()(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
- nothing provides libavutil.so.58(LIBAVUTIL_58)(64bit) needed by
wine-devel-1:9.20-1.1.x86_64 from WineHQ
Package Arch Version
Repository Size
Skipping packages with broken dependencies:
wine-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1
WineHQ 1.3 GiB
winehq-devel x86_64 1:9.20-1.1
WineHQ 62.1 KiB
Nothing to do.
Note: winehq does not yet have a Fedora 41 repo. Only shows
support for 39 and 40 on main page, but does have older repo
directories going back to 25?
So, not sure if this means Fedora Repos don't have these packages,
or if they are needed in the winehq or other repos for 41??
The wine runs fine, but just convert from 9.20 to 9.17?
Thanks.
Hi Mike,
This is a bug I reported to WineHQ:
Wine-staging 9.19-1 broken dependencies
https://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57284
The long and short of the story is WineHQ will
get to it when they get to it. They actually got
a little annoyed with me for trying to get them
to jump pm the issue before FC41 went general
release.
In he mean time, this will get you your other
updates and bypass WineHQ:
sudo dnf upgrade --allowerasing --disablerepo=WineHQ
HTH,
-T (T/Mr.T/Todd/Dude/His Resplendence)
--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
