On 10/18/24 3:55 PM, home user via users wrote:
(f40; gnome; standalone workstation)

I currently have kernel version:
- - - - - -
-bash.2[~]: uname -a
Linux coyote 6.10.12-200.fc40.x86_64 #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Sep 30 21:38:25 
UTC 2024 x86_64 GNU/Linux
-bash.3[~]:
- - - - - -

Yesterday morning, I wanted to do my weekly patches (dnf upgrade).  I saw that dnf wanted 
up upgrade the kernel to 6.11.3, but I did not see it wanting to bring in a newer version 
of the rpmfusion nvidia driver.  This looks like the sort of thing that caused me real 
problems multiple times in the past.  So I "declined" the upgrade.  I tried 
again a few minutes ago; same results; I declined again.
- - - - - -
[snip]
Dependencies resolved.
================================================================================
  Package                 Arch   Version Repo      Size
================================================================================
Installing:
  kernel                  x86_64 6.11.3-200.fc40 updates  183 k
  kernel-core             x86_64 6.11.3-200.fc40 updates   18 M
  kernel-modules          x86_64 6.11.3-200.fc40 updates   64 M
  kernel-modules-core     x86_64 6.11.3-200.fc40 updates   38 M
Upgrading:
[snip]
Installing dependencies:
  kernel-devel            x86_64 6.11.3-200.fc40 updates   21 M
Removing:
  kernel                  x86_64 6.8.7-200.fc39 @@System   0
  kernel-core             x86_64 6.8.7-200.fc39 @@System  66 M
  kernel-modules          x86_64 6.8.7-200.fc39 @@System  58 M
  kernel-modules-core     x86_64 6.8.7-200.fc39 @@System  32 M
Removing dependent packages:
  kmod-nvidia-470xx-6.8.7-200.fc39.x86_64
                          x86_64 3:470.239.06-1.fc39 @@System  25 M

Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install   5 Packages
Upgrade  45 Packages
Remove    5 Packages

Total download size: 392 M
Is this ok [y/N]: N
Operation aborted.
-bash.2[~]:
- - - - - -
I do NOT want to be running with nouveau!

I have not been able to figure out how the rpmfusion nvidia version numbers 
relate to the kernel version numbers.  So looking in the rpm fusion web site 
does not help me.  Was I correct to abandon the dnf upgrade, or should I go 
ahead with the upgrade?


A. comments.

(John)
I have the nvida driver installed but use nouveau
because my main requirement is to drive two screens, and it works.

Odd.  I also have 2 monitors.  But when I get stuck using nouveau, only one 
monitor works, and everything displays larger than it should.

(George)
rpmfusion uses Nvidia's version numbers.

Notice in my original post (above) that the rpmfusion module version numbers 
partially match the kernel version numbers.  I also saw that throughout the 
half-year that I was using the 6.10.12 kernels in f39.  So when doing weekly 
patches, I was comfortable proceeding because version numbers match, or the 
kernel version number changed only in the right part, not the left two parts 
(6.10).  It seems that if George is correct, then something changed going fro 
f39 to f40 and or going from kernel 6.10 to kernel 6.11.  The version numbers 
for the rpmfusion nvidia driver and the kernel seem to have stopped matching.  
That's the core of my initiating this thread.

B. results.

(George)
Do the upgrade and check to see if the rpmfusion module works.

I tried it.  It worked.  ...this time!

--
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to