> On 20 Aug 2024, at 17:04, Iosif Fettich <ifett...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm curious about what tool[s] you use for "simply taking a report a
> day for each disk and when
> disks act up I see if the bad sectors count are rising on one of the disks".
> 
> [I do not agree with the 'less than useful' classification of smartd.
> Did you really see situations where
> your just-look-at-the-bad-blocks strategy  did reveal some imminent
> catastrophe but smartd did _not_?
> 
> [I was thinking about opening another thread for this, but stepped
> back then again.]

If its a HDD the interesting counter from smartctl are these two for me:

  5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct   0x0033   100   100   010    Pre-fail  Always       
-       0
196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       
-       0

For an SSD I want to know hold much data has been written so that I can 
calculate
how long until the drives endurance is exceeded:

241 Host_Writes_32MiB       0x0032   100   100   000    Old_age   Always       
-       351959

For all the SSD's I own I know the endurance figure.
I will not buy an SSD that the manufacturer does not publish the endurance for.

Barry


> 
> Thank you!
> 
> În vin., 16 aug. 2024 la 19:21, Roger Heflin <rogerhef...@gmail.com> a scris:
>> 
>> Someone seems to have added it to setup a snmp config.   It is
>> unlikely you want an snmp config/install, its only use is for external
>> monitoring via the network (without ssh access) and is for the most
>> part not being used much anymore.
>> 
>> You might do a man smartd.conf and see if there is an option to
>> disable snmp config completely.
>> 
>> I also disable smartd because generally it is less than useful (I have
>> had too many "your disk is going to fail soon" notifications where the
>> disk stopped working >3 years later--so the warning was useless, I
>> have also had disks fail that smartd did not ever report as failed).
>> Generally I view its reliability is so bad the tool is actually WORSE
>> than useless since it scares you with incorrect warnings, and fails to
>> report real (usually bad sector issues) correctly.
>> 
>> I replace it with simply taking a report a day for each disk and when
>> disks act up I see if the bad sectors count are rising on one of the
>> disks.
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 10:33 AM Robert McBroom via users
>> <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Boot process f40 system stops for a long time with a problem with smartd. 
>>> Seems to access the system drives and note that they are SMART capable. The 
>>> following entries are in the journal
>>> 
>>> 
>>> smartd[977]: Warning via /usr/libexec/smartmontools/smartdnotify to root 
>>> produced>>
>>> 
>>> smartd[977]: No configuration file found at (null) or /etc/esmtprc
>>> 
>>> After multiple entries
>>> 
>>> smartd[977]: No configuration file found at (null) or /etc/esmtp
>>> 
>>> The files referenced are not in /etc. Don't see such files on a f39 system
>>> 
>>> What is the system looking to find and where can it be found.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: 
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>> --
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> -- 
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to