On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 4:02 AM Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: > > On 12/29/23 00:52, Frank Elsner via users wrote: > > How can I solve this problem? > > > > Error: Transaction test error: > > file /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/libgstasf.so from install of > > gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free-1.22.8-2.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from > > package gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1:1.22.7-1.fc39.x86_64 > > > > This is not the only file involved in this gstreamer1 update. > > It appears that Fedora packagers have made changes to the gstreamer > plugin packages without coordinating with rpmfusion.
Does Fedora have a requirement and process to provide a "heads up" to other projects, like RPMFusion? For Fedora, I know an updated package will go to testing, and if all is Ok, then to release in about a week. Is there a hook in the flow to inform projects like RPMFusion that a change is taking place, and they should build, test and prepare to release new binaries? And is a week enough time for RPMFusion to trigger a rebuild and detect/fix a problem? > I wonder what's > going on lately. Earlier it was vlc. It happens with every system-upgrade, too. It is often the graphic drivers that break. At a system upgrade (like F38 -> F39), the mailing lists, message boards and Reddit see a lot of traffic due to breaks. And the fix for users is to wait a week or so until RPMFusion updates things. It seems like (to me) lack of communication or coordination between Fedora and RPMFusion is one of the root causes of the breaks. Jeff -- _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
