On 2/6/23 04:52, Tim via users wrote:

The really odd thing is they want to argue strongly against the case of
what it appears to do (work how I expected it to) for a behaviour that
would be programmatically peculiar, that the manual doesn't even
slightly suggest, but does quite clearly explain how you're expected to
use it.

Why would you expect it to work in some way that's different from the
instructions?


Hi Tim,

If dnf is using bash "source", each instance of the
variable would erase the previous.

I also saw nowhere in the instructions (man page) to
only use them once.  I could have missed it.

And if you look at the now closed bug report, the
annalist went all the way back to FC26 and found
the behavior consistent with the last instance model.

So, although I still am scratching my head as to
why I ever go it to work and what I though I was
really seeing, I am clearly the one at fault.

-T


--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Computers are like air conditioners.
They malfunction when you open windows
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to