> On 2 Feb 2023, at 17:48, Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote:
> 
> On 02/02/2023 10:39 AM, GianPiero Puccioni wrote:
>> Yes, it suggests the usual "if you think gdb should be able to read nvidia0" 
>> give it permission etc etc, but the point is I have no idea if gdb should or 
>> not and why. What has gdb to do with nvidia0?
> 
> And that's a very good question.  If you haven't already, open a bugzilla 
> against gdb, citing that suggestion, and see what happens.  I'm almost sure 
> that if it's safe to give gdb that permission, there will be a comment 
> telling you it's OK.

Bit why is gdb  running at all?
Did something crash and is this abt(?) trying to get a backtrace?

Barry

> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to