> Am 23.07.2022 um 00:34 schrieb Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us>:
>
> On 7/22/22 16:14, Peter Boy wrote:
>> there is a reason why vi remains so popular and widespread among
>> professional system administrators.
>
> And that reason is?
The incredibly rich feature set provides an effective processing option for
(nearly) every administration task, no matter how complex. This is unmatched by
any other editor included in Fedora.
> … and that people writing walkthroughs/HOWTOs should do so in an
> editor-agnostic fashion.
I like that idea. On the other hand, hardly any how-to writes with a specific
editor in mind (e.g. "Press :wq to save and quit) and the mention of a specific
program name is more of a placeholder that can/must be adapted just like other
file- oder variable names in the sample code.
E.G. instead of
[…]# vi /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/enp1s0.nmconnection
I would have to write
[…]# {YOUR_EDITOR} /etc/NetworkManager/system-connections/{IF_NAME}.nmconnection
It’s possible, but is it worth it? The lines are usually too short anyway,
every letter counts, and it doesn't make it easier to read, and more effort
with copy & paste.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
