On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 8:16 PM Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:

> On 3/25/22 19:29, Jack Craig wrote:
> > i have a networking mystery ; i hope someone might give me a clue.
> >
> > sample route, ...
> >
> > 10.0.0.101 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
> > (internal IP) 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time
> 1033ms
> > 10.0.0.1                           Blackhole-NH
> > 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1018ms
> > 192.168.1.254                 Blackhole-ATT                        2
> > packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
> > 108.90.204.76             att subnet (local router)            2 packets
> > transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1002ms
> > 108.90.204.1            att subnet (remote GW)               2 packets
> > transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
> > 108.220.213.121 ws.linuxlighthouse.com <http://ws.linuxlighthouse.com>
> > (public IP) 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time
> 1001ms
> > 108.220.213.126   linuxlighthouse (public GW)          2 packets
> > transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
> >
> > now the  mystery. where 108.220.213.121 is a publicly visible ip for the
> > server, a remote traceroute is wonky!!
> >
> > consider the below traceroute, it reports hops up to 108.90.204.76,
> > stopping there instead of doing one more hop
> >
> >
> >    1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Linksys35675 [192.168.1.1]
> >    2     9 ms     8 ms    17 ms 142-254-236-209.inf.spectrum.com
> > <http://142-254-236-209.inf.spectrum.com> [142.254.236.209]
> >    3    12 ms    10 ms    11 ms lag-63.tjngcaac01h.netops.charter.com
> [snip]
> >   15    44 ms    43 ms    43 ms
> > 108-90-204-76.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net
> > <http://108-90-204-76.lightspeed.mtryca.sbcglobal.net> [108.90.204.76]
> >   16     *        *        *     Request timed out.
> >   17     *        *        *     Request timed out.
> >   18     *        *        *     Request timed out.
> >   19
> >
> > could anyone shed some light on this mystery??
>
> Your question and description are very confusing.  Can you try again
> with the details more organized?
> What are you trying to traceroute to at the end?  The route in the
> traceroute doesn't match the "route" from earlier.  I don't understand
> what you think should be after that last hop.
> ISPs don't always let traceroute requests go through depending on which
> method you're using.
>

i had a remote friend try  traceroute to 108.220.213.121 to show the trace
stopping at 108.90.204.76.

i dont know why it stops short of my server???

> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to