One key difference might be enabled systemd-resolved by default in
Fedora 34, but it is not in RHEL9. I think it should not be related
directly. But could it?

What does hostnamectl report after installation? What it thinks the
hostname is? Would the behaviour change if you disable systemd-resolved
and reboot?

On 1/21/22 03:35, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On 1/20/22 20:30, Tim via users wrote:
>> On Thu, 2022-01-20 at 19:45 -0600, Thomas Cameron wrote:
>>> OK, so this is weird. I just kickstarted a F35 VM. When it booted
>>> up, its hostname was host156.tc.camerontech.com, as I expected it to
>>> be.
>>>
>>> The /etc/hostname file is blank - it just has a single empty line.
>>>
>>> After I rebooted that VM, its hostname is set to fedora
>>
>> It wouldn't be quite so bad if it set its hostname to the one it
>> discovered (even though you'd rather it keep on discovering it), but
>> changing a hostname is intolerable.
>>
>> Have you tried making the hostname file immutable?
>>
>
> Thing is, the /etc/hostname file is blank! This is bizarre. I've just
> tested with F33, F34, and F35. With F33, the hostname is set to
> localhost. With F34 and F35, it's set to fedora. With RHEL 8.5, it's
> set to the reverse DNS assigned hostname. With RHEL 9 beta, it's the
> reverse DNS assigned hostname.
>
> This is weirder and weirder.
>
> Thomas
>
-- 
Petr Menšík
Software Engineer
Red Hat, http://www.redhat.com/
email: pemen...@redhat.com
PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to