在 2021-04-13星期二的 20:59 +0300，Matti Pulkkinen写道： > > As in Anaconda? Yes, It should be set in anaconda in someway. > > Yes, but that's not unexpected because that's where the problem was. > > Yes, the update is what fixed the broken configuration. Or it would > have, if it hadn't instead made a .rpmnew file instead. rpm don't know what is "broken configuration". Some users want's to override configuration and keep them as it is, rpm won't touch those files it just give you information during updating. > > -- > Terveising / Regards, > Matti Pulkkinen > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en- > US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproje > ct.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
-- Qiyu Yan GPG keyid: 0x4FC914F065F2DF12
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
