On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:33:20AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 06:40:10PM -0800, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > > Hi Matthew, > > > > I just did a > > # dnf remove rdma-core-32.0-1.fc33.x86_64 > > and now `dnf upgrade` is happy. > > > FWIW the root cause is here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919864 > ... the package was accidentally built x86_64 only, which is why DNF > couldn't find the matching i686 package. But this is only needed for > special-purpose cluster networking hardware, and I'm pretty sure 0% of > desktop users even need this package. I'm not sure what has pulled it in for > so many people.
Looking at the /var/log/anaconda files, it appears that rdma-core was included in the LiveCD image I used to load the fedora workstation that has it installed. I used the default Fedora Workstation (Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso). If I mount the rootfs inside the squashfs on the ISO, I can run: # mkdir /mnt/livecd /mnt/squashfs /mnt/rootfs # mount /slow/images/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso /mnt/livecd # mount /mnt/livecd/LiveOS/squashfs.img /mnt/squashfs # mount /mnt/squashfs/LiveOS/rootfs.img /mnt/rootfs # chroot /mnt/rootfs/ rpm -q rdma-core rdma-core-31.0-1.fc33.x86_64 Might want to remove that from the build if it shouldn't be installed. -- Jonathan Billings <billi...@negate.org> _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
