joukj wrote on 7-NOV-2020 09:14:16.24

>I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However,
>the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32.
>I already checked the following:
>   - Bios : 2 devices enabled
>   - lspci | grep -i eth  
>        gives:
>         04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 
> PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
>          06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8056 
> PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 12)
>   - settings from the gnome panel only shows one device. If you try to "add"
>     another one the MAC-adress of both devices show up in the choices. but
>     after creations nothing seems to be added (appart from an extra file in
>     /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts)
>   - ifconfig shows only one of the devices.
>   
>What should I do to make the second device useable?

some info from /var/log/messages:

for the failing device:
  Nov  6 23:42:09 vlinder kernel: sky2 0000:06:00.0 enp6s0: renamed from eth0
  Nov  6 22:42:38 vlinder systemd-udevd[525]: enp6s0: Process 
'socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event' failed with exit code 1.
  Nov  6 22:43:25 vlinder NetworkManager[2046]: <info>  [1604699005.5997] 
manager: (enp6s0): new Ethernet device 
(/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/3)

For the available device:
  Nov  6 23:42:09 vlinder kernel: sky2 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: renamed from eth1
  Nov  6 22:42:38 vlinder systemd-udevd[588]: enp4s0: Process 
'socket:@/org/freedesktop/hal/udev_event' failed with exit code 1.
  Nov  6 22:43:25 vlinder NetworkManager[2046]: <info>  [1604699005.5792] 
manager: (enp4s0): new Ethernet device 
(/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/2)
  Nov  6 22:43:25 vlinder NetworkManager[2046]: <info>  [1604699005.5944] 
device (enp4s0): state change: unmanaged -> unavailable (reason 'managed', 
sys-iface-state: 'external')
  Nov  6 22:43:25 vlinder kernel: sky2 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: enabling interface
  Nov  6 22:43:27 vlinder kernel: sky2 0000:04:00.0 enp4s0: Link is up at 100 
Mbps, full duplex, flow control both
  etc....
  
Why is much more done for enp4s0 than for enp6s0?

            regards
               Jouk


Pax, vel iniusta, utilior est quam iustissimum bellum.
    (free after Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 b.Chr.-46 b.Chr.)
     Epistularum ad Atticum 7.1.4.3)


               Touch not the cat bot a glove

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<

  Jouk Jansen
                 
  jo...@hrem.nano.tudelft.nl

  Technische Universiteit Delft        tttttttttt  uu     uu  ddddddd
  Kavli Institute of Nanoscience       tttttttttt  uu     uu  dd    dd
  Nationaal centrum voor HREM              tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  Lorentzweg 1                             tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  2628 CJ Delft                            tt      uu     uu  dd     dd
  Nederland                                tt      uu     uu  dd    dd
  tel. 31-15-2782272                       tt       uuuuuuu   ddddddd

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------<
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to