On 6/7/20 10:42 AM, Beartooth wrote:
On a System76 PC several years old, running F32 fully updated (not
Ubuntu), I see the following:
$ df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
devtmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev
tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 7.8G 1.6M 7.8G 1% /run
/dev/mapper/fedora-root 49G 16G 31G 35% /
tmpfs 7.8G 60K 7.8G 1% /tmp
/dev/mapper/fedora-home 52G 20G 30G 40% /home
/dev/sda1 976M 252M 658M 28% /boot
/dev/mapper/backup_vg-backup 1.8T 174M 1.7T 1% /.snapshots
tmpfs 1.6G 60K 1.6G 1% /run/user/65536
bash-5.0$
Going into the GUI, right clicking and choosing priorities, I see:
Link to block device (inode/blockdevice)
So I searched inode, but got over my head in no time. Searching
snapshot was a little more comprehensible, but using what I think it told
me would demand knowledge I lack. I also tried blockdevice, and that
*really* got me into a jungle of jargon.
I'm wondering whether *any* file on an old machine could be so big
as a terabyte, let alone two. If not, what if anything is df -h telling
me about this machine as compared to my others? Anything about speed or
storage?
The file is probably sparse, i.e. it is only as large as the usage
which, at the moment, is 174M. Enough snapshots and it could eventually
grow to a max of 1.8T.
I also have a still broader question. Instead of keeping each
machine, as heretofore, as nearly in sync with the others, actually as
close a copy of the others, might it be reasonably safe to keep one for
constant use and the others as supporting specialists of some sort.
Advice? Comments?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
