I don't believe the kernel.org developers work out of the fedora bugzilla (or any distro's bugzilla), so no one who knows anything is likely to find and/or see the bug.
To get a kernel developer you would need to at least post a summary to the kernel subsystem list if you know which subsystem or the main kernel if you don't. And the kernel.org guys do not care about any testing done on a fedora delivered kernel as they don't know what code is in it, so you would need to install a kernel.org kernel and bot from it and verify you have the issue on the newest released one. On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 9:33 AM Suvayu Ali <fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 5:30 PM Michael Schwendt <mschwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 28 May 2020 18:08:48 +0930, Tim via users wrote: > > > > > Perhaps there should be an automated culling of participants. If you > > > step up the plate to say you'll maintain a package, but don't, *you* > > > get dumped from bugzilla. > > > > Please let's not create a thread of doom. > > > > You can't seriously suggest blocking kernel maintainers from bugzilla just > > because they don't have the manpower to take a look at every ticket and > > perform meaningful, helpful triaging. Some key components are literally > > flooded with bug reports. In order to deal with the number of tickets, > > using scripts is an obvious thing to do. Yet it isn't done in a proper and > > OS user-friendly way. > > I agree, this is exactly the case (I'm the OP, and the person who > filed the BZ referenced earlier). There should be clear guidance how > a motivated user can follow through, do the relevant triaging, and > maybe even test an upstream kernel, In fact if you read the BZ, > you'll see that I tried vanilla RC kernels from Thorsten's repo and > reported back to the BZ. > > What baffles me most, is the nature of the bug. It is the text book > case of a high priority bug, new (budget) hardware, which is becoming > common place very fast, where Fedora isn't bootable, add to that it is > a regression bug. How does a bug with these characteristics not come > within the peripheral vision of the maintainers, specially when the > reporter is eager to do all kinds of troubleshooting and testing!? > Clearly something is wrong with the automation, the question is. how > should that be fixed? > > -- > Suvayu > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
