On 4/5/20 9:16 PM, George N. White III wrote: > On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 10:40, Frederic Muller <f...@cm17.com > <mailto:f...@cm17.com>> wrote: > > On 4/5/20 8:14 PM, francis.montag...@inria.fr > <mailto:francis.montag...@inria.fr> wrote: > > Hi. > > > > On Sun, 05 Apr 2020 08:53:46 -0300 "George N. White III" wrote: > >> On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 at 06:59, Frederic Muller <f...@cm17.com > <mailto:f...@cm17.com>> wrote: > >>> sudo dnf install openvas-gsa > >>> Error: > >>> Problem: conflicting requests > >>> - nothing provides libopenvas_base.so.9()(64bit) needed by > >>> openvas-gsa-7.0.3-10.fc31.x86_64 > > ... > >> Already noted (and first hit in my Google search): > >> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/QPAAF7E7MH2W2ZIAIKP7BGPO4RQOH7K3/ > > And still failing since September. > > > > > Maintainer probably has other priorities or has lost interest. This > could > indicate that there is now something better (for the maintainer's use > case), > have a look at https://alternativeto.net/software/openvas/ and > https://linuxsecurity.expert/tools/openvas/ > <https://linuxsecurity.expert/tools/openvas/alternatives/> . Openvas > is sort of a jack of > all trades, so there may be another tools that is better for your use > case. > > > As a temporary turnaround it seems that you can install the fc30 > > version (not fully tested): > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=30 install openvas-gsa > > > Hi! > > Thank you for the answers. Didn't find that 1st link George mentioned, > and reading it quickly didn't really get what to do. I'll look into it > deeper probably tomorrow. Now doing the --releasever=30 gives me this > initially: > > Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'updates-modular': > - Downloading successful, but checksum doesn't match > like 3 times. > > A second attempt seemed to work but is downgrading git, foomatic and a > lot of other perl packages. > > Still downloading at this stage but wanted to say thank you and > hopefully everything will be running tomorrow. > > Now should I file a bug for F31 or not? > > > Have you checked bugzilla and the openvas site? If anyone other than > you uses openvas there may already be a bug report with some indication > of the underlying issues. If you decide you need openvas it would be > useful > to try either building it directly from source or building your own > rpms so you > can document the problems in your bug report. Depending on the nature of > the problem you may find it better to file a bug report with the upstream > developer. > > -- > George N. White III Dear George,
Following Jerry's post about it I did add a comment to the existing bug. I might also try to compile from source and see what it gives. Thank you again for the support. Fred
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
