On Thu, 2020-01-02 at 09:06 -0400, George N. White III wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jan 2020 at 23:21, Robert G (Doc) Savage via users <
> users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > It would seem that "something" happened to the file(s) that provide
> > 
> > RJ45 Ethernet connectivity maybe as far back as F29. I can get a
> > WiFi
> > 
> > connection, but not an RJ45 eth0 DHCP connection. This happens in
> > my
> > 
> > home and at a nearby computer store, so it's not my DHCP server.
> 
> Use the "ip" command to see the status of your network devices.

When using WiFi, the eth0 port is down. This is normal operation. When
an RJ45 connection is made, this is the ifcfg-eth0 file that controls
it:

HWADDR=E8:6A:64:35:53:D8
TYPE=Ethernet
PROXY_METHOD=none
BROWSER_ONLY=no
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
DEFROUTE=yes
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6INIT=yes
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL=no
IPV6_PRIVACY=no
IPV6_ADDR_GEN_MODE=stable-privacy
NAME=eth0
UUID=3a1a7b73-df5e-37b9-a9af-dbc49d4120b3
ONBOOT=yes
AUTOCONNECT_PRIORITY=-999


Nothing remarkable here.
> There have been problems with the way network devices are powered 
> up and down due to changes in the kernel power management.  If you
> goggle your ethernet device or the model of your system you may find 
> the problem has already been addressed.  
> 
> If you think this is a power management problem, look for ASMP
> (Active 
> State Power Management) in dmesg.  You can install the fwts package 
> with dnf and run "$ sudo fwts aspm".
> 
> > 
> > When booted up to WiFi, connecting an RJ45 Ethernet cable shuts
> > down
> > 
> > the existing WiFi port (normal), but never comes up with a DHCP
> > address
> > 
> > for the eth0 port. The network icon just loops forever. When I
> > 
> > disconnect the RJ45 cable, WiFi connectivity resumes after 5-10
> > 
> > seconds.
> 
> Does ethernet work if you boot with the cable connected (and wifi 
> disabled if your system has an external switch)?

No. The failure appears whenever a RH45  Ethernet cable is connected.

>  
> > 
> > The problem has persisted since upgrades to both F30 and F31. I'm
> > 
> > guessing the best way to fix the problem is a fresh install of
> > whatever
> > 
> > packages provide eth0 connectivity. I'm at a loss to know what
> > those
> > 
> > packages are, and if there are any hidden potholes/landmines with
> > 
> > simply using dnf to first remove then to install them from scratch.
> 
> If you have an older system you may be missing a binary blob, in
> which 
> case dnf won't help.
> 

Perhaps I should have noted that this is an almost new ThinkPad P72
laptop. I installed F29 in Dec 2018 and upgraded to F30 shortly
thereafter. I recently upgraded to F31. I would like to avoid the
trouble of scrapping an otherwise working system that a total from-
scratch installation of F31 would involve.

> I have semi-retired 10-year old desktop running Linux Mint.   In the
> last year 
> or so the linux kernel people did a purge of unmaintained,
> unsupported
> 
>  binary 
> blobs (including the tigon3 ethernet hardware in my system).   This
> was 
> due to security concerns as well as the extra workload for kernel
> maintainers.
> 
> 
> There was a line in dmesg giving the name of the missing file.  I had
> to
> find the missing driver file and put it in the appropriate location. 
> Check 
> your ethernet device and the status of the drivers on the vendor's
> site.   
>  Fedora appears to have the binary blob for my hardware, as 
> I was able to install Fedora 30 from a live USB and upgrade to 31.
> 
> > 
> > If it matters, I'm using the mate v1.22.2 desktop. Here are all the
> > 
> > *mate* packages I have installed:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > # rpm -qa | grep mate | sort  [...] 
> 
> Some detailed guideance would be much appreciated.
> > 
> > Incidentally, I have appended " net.ifnames=0" to the
> > 
> > GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX= line and rebuilt the initramfs to revert back
> > to
> > 
> > classic eth0 nomenclature for the RJ45 Ethernet port. I can't stand
> > the
> > 
> > new naming convention. :-)
> 
> Does ethernet work if you revert the changes (or did it  work before
> the 
> changes)?

This was done within the past 30 days. The connection problem has
existed long before the port name was changed.

--Doc Savage
     Fairview Heights, IL.



_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to