On Sun, 2019-11-17 at 12:40 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
> On 11/17/19 2:48 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > What am I missing?
> > 
> 
> A follow-up of sorts....
> 
> In your original post you indicated
> 
> Firewall setup on the host:
>    [poc@Bree ~]$ firewall-cmd --list-all
>    home (active)
>      target: default
>      icmp-block-inversion: no
>      interfaces: enp3s0
> 
> As far as missing, I think we both missed that "virbr0" didn't appear
> in the interfaces line.
> 
> I was thrown in my setup since when using the firewall-config GUI it
> shows the default zone of the virbr0 interface to be "public" and that
> is where I was making changes.  But, I think, it was always in the 
> libvirt zone.
> 
> I think I need file a BZ against firewall-config. 

The same thing had me confused. I added a comment to your BZ report.
Having a GUI that lies about the real situation is worse than not
having one at all. Makes me wonder what else it's hiding.

poc
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to