On 03/21/18 14:48, Tim wrote: > Allegedly, on or about 21 March 2018, Ed Greshko sent: >> Anyway, I've since determined that the directory name >> 7725dfc225d14958a625ddaaaea5962b is derived from the contents of >> /etc/machine-id > For what it's worth, I have a collection of those empty directories on > my older installation (FC26), and two sets because I changed a > motherboard. The bizarre conglomeration of directories made no sense, > to me, until your comment, above. > > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/SZkbx0H8W09msV5jVjpliw > > But it strikes me, though, are these empty directories something that > ought to get erased once the kernel has been installed? Is there any > point to them being there. >
Yes, I think those empty directories should have been deleted by some process. I can't see a point in leaving those around. Now, I'm trying to decided what component to file the BZ about the install failure when grubby is erased. I'm thinking it should be filed against "kernel" and that an added require of /sbin/new-kernel-pkg be added to ensure grubby is installed. -- Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a fact.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
