On 03/19/18 08:49, ToddAndMargo wrote:
> On 03/18/2018 05:39 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>   So, I'm not so sure your claim of
>> "Fedora Dragging Their Feet" is valid.
>
>
> I hope not!  The main reason I left RHEL was that it took
> forever to NEVER to fix bugs.  I am so tickled with
> Fedora I am still giddy.  With the Tiniest exceptions,
> IT JUST WORKS.  Oh, and it is more stable than RHEL because
> Fedora keeps up on fixing bugs.

FWIW, I downloaded the source for libmtp-1.1.14.

You said your device is defined as...

Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 8 using 
xhci_hcd
Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: New USB device found, idVendor=17ef,
idProduct=789a
Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: New USB device strings: Mfr=2, Product=3,
SerialNumber=4
Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: Product: Lenovo
Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: Manufacturer: MediaTek
Mar 18 17:25:43 rn6 kernel: usb 1-1.1: SerialNumber: DIUKAELR5HTOCM9P

Well, it seems it is defined in music-players.h

music-players.h:  { "Lenovo", 0x17ef, "A10-70F", 0x789a,
                                DEVICE_FLAGS_ANDROID_BUGS },
                               

So, looking at the other links you've noted it seemed that previously your 
device
wasn't defined.  Now, it is.  So, maybe this is a new issue that has crept in?

-- 
Conjecture is just a conclusion based on incomplete information. It isn't a 
fact.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to