On Thursday 15 March 2018 15:43:49 Tim wrote:
> I thought with RAID1 being "all drives identical," and that unless you
> were using yet another drive to boot from (separate from your raid),
> that each drive would have a boot partition on it.  Following that
> train of thought, if your controller didn't let you boot from a
> different drive (which seems a serious shortcoming, to me), wouldn't it
> be possible to just unplug the drives and put your still working one
> into the first slot?
>
> Just a brute force and ignorance approach to the situation...
>
> Seems to me that the idea of mirrored drives is to give an easy way of
> dealing with drive failures, surely it shouldn't impose complex
> routines to get past the first drive going bad.

Tim,

That is exactly what I thought until I was in that situation. sda failed so I 
disconnected it, leaving just sdb connected. It refused to boot. I tried 
swapping the cable to put it in the same SATA port on the board but it still 
didn't boot.

Last time was some time ago, and /boot could not be a RAID device. This 
time /boot is a RAID device, but /boot/efi isn't and is just a vfat 
partition.

Hence my question. If I just dd this partition from sda to sdb would that then 
make sdb bootable?
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to