Hello.

SecureBoot should not be a problem, because the Bootloader on Fedora is
signed.

I have Secureboot enabled on my machine, which is a HP (Compaq)
Notebook and everything runs fine.

Regards,
Dirk


Am Sonntag, den 25.02.2018, 11:22 -0700 schrieb stan:
> On Sun, 25 Feb 2018 12:15:05 -0500
> Bob Goodwin <bobgood...@fastmail.us> wrote:
> 
> > I ordered another Asrock motherboard to replace the one I haven;t
> > been able to install Fedora 27 on. The user manual says it can be
> > setup to boot uefi or legacy bios by enabling csm. I do not need to
> > dual boot with Windows, only Fedora 27 so it appears to me that the
> > legacy option is best in my case.
> > 
> > Is that rightor am I missing something?
> 
> My understanding is that secure boot is to protect from unauthorized
> access to the machine, and prevent unauthorized software from running
> on the machine.  Important for things like laptops that are liable to
> be stolen, but less necessary for home desktop computers.
> 
> That is, I agree with you.  But I look forward to seeing the
> reasoning
> of people who disagree.
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Dirk Gottschalk
Paulusstrasse 6-8
52064 Aachen
Tel.: +49 1573 1152350

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to