On 08/06/2017 01:37 PM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: > On Sun, 06 Aug 2017 12:51:12 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> On 08/06/2017 11:53 AM, Amadeus W.M. wrote: >>> On Sat, 05 Aug 2017 23:20:53 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 6 Aug 2017 02:59:25 +0000 (UTC) >>>> Amadeus W.M. wrote: >>>> >>>>> I assume there are people there who are using the nvidia driver right >>>>> now, >>>>> some maybe using the rpmfusion rpms. Can someone post which libGL >>>>> they have installed on their system and how they got the whole thing >>>>> to work? >>>> >> Oh, and the other thing I would check is to make sure you're loading the >> correct glx module..... >> >> [egreshko@acer log]$ grep -i glx /var/log/Xorg.0.log [ 94.014] (II) >> "glx" will be loaded by default. >> [ 94.014] (II) LoadModule: "glx" >> [ 94.015] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/nvidia-340xx/xorg/libglx.so [ >> 94.162] (II) Module glx: vendor="NVIDIA Corporation" >> [ 94.163] (II) NVIDIA GLX Module 340.102 Mon Jan 16 12:37:38 PST >> 2017 [ 97.130] (II) Initializing extension GLX [ 97.130] (II) >> Indirect GLX disabled.(II) config/udev: Adding input device Power Button >> (/dev/input/event3)\ >> >> >> In a previous post by you I saw... >> >> Major opcode of failed request: 154 (NV-GLX) >> >> Which seems odd.... > Spot on! See my post with the possible solution. The X server was trying > to load /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so > which fails with the nvidia driver. I fixed this - getto-style - by > linking the xorg libglx.so to the nvidia libglx.so (which is in > /usr/lib64/nvidia-340xx) and, knock on wood, all seems well now. > > I don't know why it was trying to load the xorg glx because > > cat /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/99-nvidia.conf > #This file is provided by xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-340xx > #Do not edit > > Section "Files" > ModulePath "/usr/lib64/nvidia-340xx/xorg" > ModulePath "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules" > EndSection > > So it stands to reason that if it searches the paths in the above order it > should find the nvidia libglx.so. >
Well, you've created a symbolic link to "workaround" an issue. However, it should not have been necessary and wasn't necessary in my case. I would be concerned that some update in the future may end up removing your link or overwriting the file to which it is linked to and put you back in confusion mode. I ran the nvidia-config script and wrote the resulting file to a temp location. I noticed that it has the line Load "glx" which may override the information in 99-nvidia.conf or be parsed before that..... So, if you still have the xorg.conf I would try to do away with that and get the correct lib loaded without a link....as you may find yourself in this situation at a later date and forgot what you did to "fix" it. :-) -- Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
