Allegedly, on or about 29 June 2017, stan sent:
> after the comments in this thread, I think maybe I'm not paranoid
> enough.  That the IT security professionals are paranoid enough to
> cover their cameras? If they're that worried they're vulnerable, it's
> a good bet I should be.  :-) 

It's not as far-fetched as you might think.  

One day I noticed, while in the middle of browsing, that the "camera is
on" LED had lit up, though not noticing *when* it came on.  I wasn't
doing anything nefarious, so somewhere in the midst of a pile of
ordinary websites I'd browsed through, one of them was a nosey parker.

The galling thing is that at no time was I asked to permit it to happen,
and my browser was set up so that it should.

So, my laptop's built in camera is taped over, too.  If it weren't such
a near-impossible task, I'd unplug the damn thing.

-- 
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64 
(always current details of the computer that I'm writing this email on)

Boilerplate:  All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is
no point trying to privately email me, I only get to see the messages
posted to the mailing list.

A positive attitude is worth the effort if it annoys enough people.


_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to