On Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:08:50 -0800
Joe Zeff <j...@zeff.us> wrote:

> On 01/06/2017 11:57 AM, stan wrote:
> > Is there a way to make the kernel boot in deterministic fashion
> > again? Everything will be done sequentially, and no task will kick
> > off if its predecessors are not done.  
> 
> I think I know the answer, but I'm going to ask anyway: why?  I'm
> asking because there's probably more than one way to do it (There
> usually is in Linux.) and the best way will depend on what you need.

So I can be assured that variation in the boot process is eliminated as
a factor in any problem I'm seeing.

To use the NetworkManager case as an example, I boot with multi-thread,
see the error, save the boot record.  Then, boot with single thread /
process, don't get the error, and save the boot record.  Compare them,
and the clue to what is going wrong is highlighted.

When I looked at the options, no obvious way to do this popped out, so
I thought I would tap the collective wisdom.  If you know more than
one, I'd be happy to hear them all.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to