On a related note, did the kernel devs ever fix the bug where high I/O would make the system basically unusable? This sounds a lot like that, but I thought stuff like blk-mq were supposed to fix it.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 1:13 PM, jd1008 <jd1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12/11/2016 06:08 AM, Tom Horsley wrote: > >> Last night I was "optimizing" a qcow2 virtual image >> (after zero filling the free space), running (as root): >> >> qemu-img convert -f qcow2 -O qcow2 old.img new.img >> >> The copying and scanning for zero blocks pretty >> much took over the disk. Anything else I tried to run >> which needed access to something on that disk would >> hang for minutes at a time before getting through. >> >> Is that normal behavior? I thought folks were supposed >> to take turns and play nice together :-). >> _______________________________________________ >> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > So "qcow2 old.img" is on the file system you want other apps to access, > and so is "new.img" ? this sounds like "as if" qemu-img wants to make sure > that the two images, old and new, will not be modified during the > conversion > process. Since you ARE running as root, you have the privs to run the > conversion > at a very high priority that, for most of the time, it is picked first off > the run queue > and placed on cpu, and "might" even be inhibiting access to the filesystem > hosting > the 2 images during the conversion. > > Now this is all conjecture on my part as I have never used it. > > Other issues might be > 1. The drive is a very slow drive > and/or > 2. You do not have sufficient ram for buffering large amounts of data > and/or > 3. You do not have multiple cores for other threads to run on different > cores. > > One of the ways to really debug this is to scan the source code of > qemu-img to > see what priority it tries to give itself, what read/write/ioctl > operations it is performing > and look up the man pages on those operations to see if they are being > performed > in a manner that the process (in the kernel) spins idly while waiting for > the operation > to finish, and also scan the kernel to see if the huge FS spinlock is held > during the entire > conversion operation. > > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org