On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Tom H <tomh0...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Michael B Allen <iop...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote: >>> On 11/04/2016 12:58 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: >>>> >>>> Of course my local network is a .local domain so it seems at least in >>>> my case mdns cannot really be used effectively. >>> >>> Well, that right there is your problem. Don't do that... >> >> Why? I thought Intranet networks were supposed to use .local. > > In the MS world (in the past?).
I don't think this was a MS thing. I recall .local being used a loooong time ago. It used to be that .local was absolutely the recommended method for small private networks. From googling around it seems there is a lot of nonsense about using .local versus using a subdomain. The only decent reason I can think of for not using .local is if you want to get SSL certs for intranet hosts in which case using .local would not be appropriate and it seems recently CAs will no longer issue certs for made-up TLDs. Otherwise, it looks like Apple just highjacked .local for mDNS. Mike _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
