On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Samuel Sieb <sam...@sieb.net> wrote:
> On 04/05/2016 02:14 PM, John J. McDonough wrote:
>>
>> I think somehow the path through the virbr to the host across the
>> network to the server the port is getting masqueraded.  Even tried
>> specifying the port but it came back different on the server. (although
>> it looks like the port option doesn't work for NFS3+)
>
> By default, virbr is NATed, so it's quite likely thta the source port will
> change when passing through that interface.

Oops. I forgot about that in my earlier email because I don't use the
default NATed setup so my route-setting advice wouldn't work. Sorry.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to