Hi siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com Thanks for your reply. I did in same way but the monitor is not detecting. It is displaying no signal. Yes I would like to mention that its 64 bit system. I have been trying it since one month and I have search the net almost everyday for the solution but no luck yet. Thanks Pankaj On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:06 AM, <users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org>wrote:
> Send users mailing list submissions to > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > users-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > users-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of users digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: can't set Okular as helper pdf app in Firefox (Rex Dieter) > 2. Re: can't set Okular as helper pdf app in Firefox (Rex Dieter) > 3. Re: USB to parallel port printer adapter does not work > anymore. (F13) (Tim) > 4. Why are 0 karma updates still being released? (Mike Fedyk) > 5. Re: screen res problem (Dale J. Chatham) > 6. Re: Ugly little hand [Solved] (Jonathan Ryshpan) > 7. fnfx trouble on Toshiba (Yogesh) > 8. Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released? > (Stephen Gallagher) > 9. Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released? > (Sam Varshavchik) > 10. Re: screen res problem (Craig White) > 11. Re: twin display f12 (Siddhesh Poyarekar) > 12. Re: Removing/Cemsoring bad Fedora mirrors? (Daniel B. Thurman) > 13. Re: Chromium by default? (Rahul Sundaram) > 14. Re: netinst images: What's the point? (Richard Shaw) > 15. Re: netinst images: What's the point? (Rahul Sundaram) > 16. Re: Chromium by default? (Genes MailLists) > 17. Re: F13 installation: successful with small problem and > larger one. (Richard Shaw) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:56:30 -0500 > Subject: Re: can't set Okular as helper pdf app in Firefox > Claude Jones wrote: > > > On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 01:30:45 pm Rex Dieter wrote: > >> So, long-story-short, not sure why firefox isn't using these items for > >> you. > > > > long-story-short, I looked at those files and Okular was definitely > listed > > as the relevant app - that's all, I just looked, changing nothing > > OK, I can reproduce the problem now. :( > > I'll bang on it awhile, and let you know when/if I find any solutions. > > -- Rex > > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:59:52 -0500 > Subject: Re: can't set Okular as helper pdf app in Firefox > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Claude Jones wrote: > > > >> On Wednesday, June 02, 2010 01:30:45 pm Rex Dieter wrote: > >>> So, long-story-short, not sure why firefox isn't using these items for > >>> you. > >> > >> long-story-short, I looked at those files and Okular was definitely > >> listed as the relevant app - that's all, I just looked, changing nothing > > > > OK, I can reproduce the problem now. :( > > > > I'll bang on it awhile, and let you know when/if I find any solutions. > > I take it back, I had a local pref set in > ~/.local/share/applications/defaults.list > that was getting in the way. How about you? > > -- Rex > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tim <ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:56:41 +0930 > Subject: Re: USB to parallel port printer adapter does not work anymore. > (F13) > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 11:54 -0700, Mick M. wrote: > > Any help appreciated > > Since you say "any help," if you cannot overcome this problem, or wish > to avoid similar problems in the future, I reckon that parallel to > network adaptors, rather than parallel to USB, are far more useful. > > -- > [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r > 2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686 > > Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I > read messages from the public lists. > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Mike Fedyk <mfe...@mikefedyk.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 17:31:29 -0700 > Subject: Why are 0 karma updates still being released? > Here is a sampling of the recent updates that have been pushed to > stable. There are more, I didn't look at every update. > > Released straight to stable: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.0.1-47.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ClanLib-2.1.1-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.5-1.fc12 > > Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma. > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12 > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12 > > Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable > without people other than the packager testing it? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Dale J. Chatham" <d...@chatham.org> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 19:54:48 -0500 > Subject: Re: screen res problem > <humor> > > Uh, dude. I'm an amateur astronomer and truly enjoy "exploring the stars". > . > > No need to insult us stargazers :) > > </humor> > > This is an individual not suited to have any interaction with humans > > On 06/02/2010 06:05 PM, jack craig wrote: > >> >> >>> Of course he is a "Superior Being". Don't you realize this he is... >>> >>> Dave Ocame, WS1ETI >>> Awards Chair >>> The SETILeague, Inc >>> >>> Stony Creek Observatory >>> FN31og >>> -72.834 longitude >>> 41.272 latitude >>> Member: The SETILeague, Inc. and, >>> The Society for Amateur Radio Astronomy (SARA) and, >>> The Planetary Society >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> I doubt his porcupine personality is suited for more than exploring the >> stars. >> Gawd forbid he actually encounters any real intelligence out there... >> >> they keep those observatories way out in the sticks for more than one >> reason! :-D >> >> >> > > > -- > Our peculiar security is in the possession of a written Constitution. > Let us not make it a blank paper by construction." > > --Thomas Jefferson, letter to Wilson Nicholas, 1803 > > There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. > -- Ed Howdershelt (Author) > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Jonathan Ryshpan <jonr...@pacbell.net> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:01:58 -0700 > Subject: Re: Ugly little hand [Solved] > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:55 -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: > > The cursor that displays over desktop icons and links in Firefox, among > > other places -- a little black hand pointing up -- is really ugly. (At > > least I think so.) How can it be changed? > > Appearance Preferences->Theme->Customize Theme > > allows changing the default cursor but not others. > > I was confused because only one cursor-theme was installed, namely > dmz-cursor-theme (the default), which made gnome cursor control > System->Preferences->Appearance->Customize Theme->Pointer > seem not to be good for anything. As soon as I loaded some other > themes, namely: > bluecurve-cursor-theme-8.0.2.5.fc12.noarch > moblin-cursor-theme-0.3.2.noarch > oxygen-cursor-themes-4.4.3.1.fc13.1.noarch > this choice box became very useful. > > > Same question for the whirling circle that displays when the system is > > busy. > > This may be better too. Haven't been able to check so far. > > Thanks to all - jon > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Yogesh <yogesh...@gmail.com> > To: Fedora Mailing List <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 21:05:24 -0400 > Subject: fnfx trouble on Toshiba > Hello, > > I have very recently migrated to Fedora from Windows. I have installed it > on my Toshiba L505-S5971 laptop. > I installed fnfx after reading about it in some forum. That went fine. > > Now with every boot I get the following message. > > Starting fnfxd: modprobe: FATAL: Error inserting toshiba_acpi > (/lib/modules/2.6.33.5-112.fc13.i686/kernel/drivers/platform/x86/toshiba_acpi.ko): > No such device > > FnFX Daemon v0.3 (c) 2003, 2004 Timo Hoenig <thoe...@nouse.net> > > fatal error: Could open /proc/acpi/toshiba/keys. > > Please make sure that your kernel has enabled the Toshiba option in the > ACPI section. > For more information read the documentation and/or > http://fnfx.sf.net/index.php?section=doc#kernel. > > Currently, the hotkeys are not working. Also, I guess, there is not control > over the CPU fan. It is being used heavily and all the time. It makes noise. > > Can someone help me with this? How should I go about this? > > Thanks > > -Yogesh > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:11:19 -0400 > Subject: Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released? > On 06/02/2010 08:31 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> Here is a sampling of the recent updates that have been pushed to >> stable. There are more, I didn't look at every update. >> >> Released straight to stable: >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gdb-7.0.1-47.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ClanLib-2.1.1-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fuse-convmvfs-0.2.5-1.fc12 >> >> Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma. >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12 >> >> Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable >> without people other than the packager testing it? >> > > I can't speak for the specific packages above, but I will sometimes push a > package stable to Fedora N-1 that is identical to a package in Fedora N if > the package in Fedora N got sufficient Karma. Maybe that's what happened > here? > > > > -- > Stephen Gallagher > RHCE 804006346421761 > > Delivering value year after year. > Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. > http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/ > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Sam Varshavchik <mr...@courier-mta.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 21:17:20 -0400 > Subject: Re: Why are 0 karma updates still being released? > Mike Fedyk writes: > > Pushed to testing and then to stable a few days later with zero karma. >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bti-026-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vidalia-0.2.9-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/EekBoek-2.00.02-1.fc12 >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fsarchiver-0.6.10-1.fc12 >> >> Why are we still pushing to stable or submitting directly to stable >> without people other than the packager testing it? >> > > Maybe because nobody is aware that something's waiting for some karma out > there? > > I see that openssh was pushed to stable recently. I might've been willing > to grab it from testing and give it whirl, but I'm not sure how I would've > known about it. Whatever this errata fixed, it obviously didn't affect me, > so I was not aware of the open bug, and a pending errata. > > It's just a hunch, but here's what I think happens most of the time: > someone files a bug, the maintainer picks it up, fixes the bug, pushes the > package to testing. > > So, you've really got just the bug reporter who's interested in the errata, > and is even aware of a package. And most of the time it's an ordinary user > who is not even aware of the underlying infrastructure. A canned message > gets appended to the Bugzilla entry, saying something to the effect that a > package was "pushed" somewhere. The bug reporter may not be aware of the > fact that there's some kind of a mechanism to rate the pending update. The > bug reporter is most likely waiting until he gets a popup from Packagekit, > telling him that an update is ready. > > I had someone file a bug against my small, obscure package. It was an > enhancement. I finally got around to coding it, tarring it up (I'm my own > upstream), then grabbing it with my maintainer hat, building it, and pushing > it to testing. > > So, how long should I wait for some karma? In the past, I've waited two > weeks before requesting a push to stable. Is there a policy document > somewhere that lays down the law, on this? > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Craig White <craigwh...@azapple.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:42:57 -0700 > Subject: Re: screen res problem > On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 19:54 -0500, Dale J. Chatham wrote: > > <humor> > > > > Uh, dude. I'm an amateur astronomer and truly enjoy "exploring the > > stars". . > > > > No need to insult us stargazers :) > > > > </humor> > > > ---- > you know what they say... 99% of the lawyers give the rest of them a bad > name. > > Craig > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyare...@gmail.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 08:46:15 +0530 > Subject: Re: twin display f12 > On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:01 AM, pankaj singh <simranj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > twin display on fedora 12 > > > > Hello friend I have HP pavilion dv4 laptop and fedora 12 is installed on > > that. I would like to display the laptop screen on other monitor. I do > not > > have NVIDIA graphics card. > > Can anybody help me setting the laptop display on the external monitor. > > In most cases it is just the matter of plugging in the other monitor > and starting the gnome-display-properties program (System > > Preferences > Monitors or Screens) and "turning on" the other monitor > through it. Be sure that the physical monitor is turned on too. > > > -- > Siddhesh Poyarekar > http://siddhesh.in > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "Daniel B. Thurman" <d...@cdkkt.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:26:46 -0700 > Subject: Re: Removing/Cemsoring bad Fedora mirrors? > On 06/02/2010 03:20 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > Daniel B. Thurman writes: > > > >> One would think that yum can detect "hangs" and > >> move on to the next mirror to pick up the slack, > >> but this is not the case, or so I am led to believe... > > > > It's been my consistent experience that yum waits about 30 seconds or > > so, before giving up and going to the next mirror. > > > Yes, that is true for a "behaving mirror", but in my case, > and on F12, it hangs a very long time (I went away for 30 > minutes... came back, and no go!) > > So... it was strange. > > Seems that the hang in that mirror in question had > a firm grip on the connection and would not time out > at all OR yum thinks somehow the connection is still > live even though there is no activity whatsoever. I > had to ^C the yum connection to break yum, blacklist > the offending mirror and try again. This time it worked. > > Strange. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:58:39 +0530 > Subject: Re: Chromium by default? > On 06/01/2010 01:54 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote: > > Chrome/Chromium browser has more than 70 million users[3], much more > > than Fedora itself, for me that proves it is a good and stable > > browser. > > > > I think that assertion is wrong. Firefox has more users but more > importantly, the large majority of Chrome users are unlikely to be using > Linux and a even smaller percentage would be using Chromium and a even > smaller percentage would be using Spot's repo in Fedora and that's the > number that actually counts. > > Rahul > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 22:31:03 -0500 > Subject: Re: netinst images: What's the point? > On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Joseph L. Casale > > <jcas...@activenetwerx.com> wrote: > >>>I'm not sure what's wrong, I just know it never asks me to initialize > >>>a network connection unless I specify "askmethod", then it does it in > >>>the non-graphical part of the setup. > >> > >> I just pulled the x86 iso down (only had x64) and whipped up a vm in > esxi > >> w/ an emulated E1000 nic and it asked me to initialize the nic once I > hit > >> the gui before the package selection step. > >> > >> What kind of nic do you have? Maybe a bug wrt your hardware only? > > > > I'll try booting the image in Virtualbox and see if it prompts me for nic > init. > > Well sure enough, I tried several different options in anaconda under > virtualbox and it asked me to init my nic every time. At this point I > don't know if it's a problem of using the livecd tools, which is > unlikely, or that it doesn't see the nic on my netbook, which seems > equally unlikely since I had F12 running on it quite well without any > 3rd party drivers. > > One thing I do know, the error message could be far more useful. > > Thanks, > Richard > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 09:03:43 +0530 > Subject: Re: netinst images: What's the point? > On 06/03/2010 09:01 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Well sure enough, I tried several different options in anaconda under > > virtualbox and it asked me to init my nic every time. At this point I > > don't know if it's a problem of using the livecd tools, which is > > unlikely, or that it doesn't see the nic on my netbook, which seems > > equally unlikely since I had F12 running on it quite well without any > > 3rd party drivers. > > > > One thing I do know, the error message could be far more useful. > > > > Yeah. File a bug report against Anaconda and followup on it. > > Rahul > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Genes MailLists <li...@sapience.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:05:45 -0400 > Subject: Re: Chromium by default? > On 06/02/2010 11:28 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 06/01/2010 01:54 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote: > >> Chrome/Chromium browser has more than 70 million users[3], much more > >> than Fedora itself, for me that proves it is a good and stable > >> browser. > >> > > > > I think that assertion is wrong. Firefox has more users but more > > importantly, the large majority of Chrome users are unlikely to be using > > Linux and a even smaller percentage would be using Chromium and a even > > smaller percentage would be using Spot's repo in Fedora and that's the > > number that actually counts. > > > > Rahul > > > Whilst above is true - the vast majority of linux users may very well > be or will be using chrome even if they are not the majority of chrome > users. Obviously because Linux is not the majority of desktop os' users > either - tho it is becoming the dominant server os (see top 500 list for > example how it is dominated by linux). So of course we are not the > dominant browser users either .. so what. > > Chrome is the up and comer and will overtake firefox in due time imho. > It is way, way, way better than firefox in a large number of important > ways. It is young still but in a short time has gained enormous > momentum. And it is not just windows users switching. > > However, that is google-chrome - I have not tried spots repo for a > while but when I first tried it it was far less functional than > google-chrome - cannot tell you why (java flash problems primarily if I > recall). > > At present chrome is eating mostly IE users and safari users ... and > linux firefox users. I actually no longer know anyone using firefox on > linux (not saying there are none) but everyone I know using linux - > regardless of distro is using google-chrome and holding firefox > just-in-case something has stupidly checked for IE/FF. > > Everyone I know used to use firefox on linux - and that has changed .. > ok not 70 MM but quite a large number! > > We should be advancing chrome (or chromium) - it is in our best > interest - to work on either chromium or with google to include > google-chrome in fedora. Google has switched their desktops to linux or > mac (users choice) - now theres a few more chrome users on linux .. ;-) > > gene > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Richard Shaw <hobbes1...@gmail.com> > To: Community support for Fedora users <users@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 23:06:45 -0500 > Subject: Re: F13 installation: successful with small problem and larger > one. > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 4:31 PM, fred smith > <fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us> wrote: > > Hi gang! > > > > I installed F13 on my eeepc 901 on Friday. Since I changed the > partitioing > > scheme, I backed up the whole thing onto a USB HD first so I could > restore > > my home directory afterwards (in fact I also kept dd images of /dev/sda > > and /dev/sdb in case I decided to put F12 back on it later.) > > > > first small problem: > > I wanted /dev/sda (4 gig SSD) to contain /boot and /. I wanted /dev/sdb > > (16gig SSD) to contain swap and /home. I DID NOT want LVM. I DID want > > encrypted filesystems. But when I tell Anaconda to partition without LVM > > and without VG, it disables encrypted partition option. Is there any > > way to regain that feature? > > I'm a little late to the conversation but just to offer another > option. I actually did want LVM on my EEEPC 701. I only have a 4GB > main SSD as well and I also have a 4GB SD card it it. On my original > install of F12 I found the SSD to be rather slow so since I don't keep > anything important on it I decided to experiment with an LVM striped > volume. I end up wasting a little space for two reasons. One I need a > /boot that's not in LVM, and two, although both are considered 4GB > storage devices, they are not exactly the same size. > > Anyway, I used gparted from System Rescue CD on a flash drive to setup > my partitions since anaconda can be rather limiting, especially prior > to the F13 version. Then I use the custom disk layout option and > manually set everything up. > > I find a noticeable reduction in program load times with the LVM > stripe and if eithe drive goes bad, no problem. Like I said I don't > keep anything important on it. > > Richard > > > -- > users mailing list > users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe or change subscription options: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users > Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
