On Sun, 2016-01-31 at 13:49 -0500, bruce wrote: > The situation will potentially scale/get to: > -50-100 instances on the rackspace/digitialocean cloud > -the process needs the ability to externally interface with a few of > the > boxes/instances via name as opposed to ipaddress (thus the DNS) > -the internal processes need the ability to be accessible from the > other > instances via name (again, the reason for dns) I'd prefer not to > do ssh test@1.2.3.4 to instances within the internal boxes/instances > --names are much easier.. > --the internal machines for the most part are connected to other > internal > instances/boxes.. -- ie, will not be accessed externally > > -while one could manage /etc/host files.. not looking to do that for > 50/100 instances.. which is why the dns questions are being posed.
I think Pete's reply gives a more complete answer. I was thinking more of the typical home network rather than a large-scale cloud deployment. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
