On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Rick Stevens <ri...@alldigital.com> wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 12:06 PM, Greg Woods wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Rick Stevens <ri...@alldigital.com >> <mailto:ri...@alldigital.com>> wrote: >> >> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-23-x86_64 >> >> which is a symlink to: >> >> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-23-primary >> >> >> I have run into the situation where this symlink still points to the >> wrong place, which would cause any of the RPMs to fail the check. Look >> to see if the symlink is actually pointing where it should. I've also >> seen it try to use /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-x86_64, so check >> to see that this one points to the correct Fedora version's key. >> >> There are clearly some bugs in dnf system-upgrade where setting up the >> GPG keys isn't done correctly. >> > > That's an issue, but what was scary to me was that the RPM was > referencing a file or symlink that did NOT have the Fedora version > in it--just "fedora-x86_64" rather than "fedora-23-x86_64". Something > like a kernel that doesn't specify the version is a BAD thing (IMHO). > > In other words, I don't think this is a dnf issue, but rather an RPM > packaging error (at least in these two cases). easy workaround was --nogpgcheck option of dnf
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
