On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 07:43:49PM +0000, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote: > Rahul Sundaram <methe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> However, if somebody runs "dnf upgrade" on the command shell then > >> he clearly wants the latest updates. Right now! No caching or other > >> magic involved. That's the whole point of running "dnf upgrade" > >> manually, otherwise the user would have left the whole updating > >> business to some automated background task. > > > > If this is what you want, use dnf update --refresh instead > > That does clearly *not* provide the latest updates. It's better than > without "--refresh", but "dnf clean metadata" is required for full > updates available.
FWIW, this my bug report fell on deaf ears: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246253 I find it disheartening how it was closed without even acknowledging that the problem exists, so I decided not to pursue this further. If someone is willing to put in the effort to push for this, please reopen the bug. Or maybe a new one, specifically on --refresh not doing what it is supposed to. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
