Dear fellow Fedora users,

\begin{rant}
I have tried to use firefox on/off for a while, and I know since it is 
opensource, Fedora will stick with it even though it has become a big and ugly 
resource taker :(.

The other day I was giving it a chance and browsing the web happily, and then 
all of a sudden my machine died on me, I could not move the mouse, I could not 
CTRL+ALT+F2 to get a terminal(since CTRL+ALT+BACKSPACE was removed by 
Xorg(thanks guys)) I could not normally do anything leaving me no choice but to 
PRESS AND HOLD POWER BUTTON till the machine shut down.  Several days later I 
see abrt kick in telling about the Sleeping function error(see other post), and 
luckily abrt captured it:  

BUG: soft lockup - CPU#3 stuck for 61s! [firefox:3100]
Modules linked in: ppp_deflate zlib_deflate ppp_async crc_ccitt ppp_generic 
slhc fuse Intel536 slamr(P) ungrab_winmodem sunrpc cpufreq_ondemand 
acpi_cpufreq ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 
uinput snd_hda_codec_analog arc4 ecb snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec r8169 mii 
snd_hwdep snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm iTCO_wdt i2c_i801 snd_timer 
iTCO_vendor_support snd soundcore snd_page_alloc rtl8187 mac80211 asus_atk0110 
cfg80211 rfkill eeprom_93cx6 sky2 pata_acpi firewire_ohci ata_generic 
firewire_core dm_multipath crc_itu_t usb_storage pata_jmicron nouveau ttm 
drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: microcode]
Pid: 3100, comm: firefox Ta"Community support for Fedora users" 
<users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
inted: P           (2.6.32.9-70.fc12.i686.PAE #1) P5K Deluxe
EIP: 0060:[<c07a57f3>] EFLAGS: 00200297 CPU: 3
EIP is at _spin_lock_bh+0x20/0x27
EAX: efe22000 EBX: f2edb470 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 00006c6b
ESI: c09d2928 EDI: 00000002 EBP: efe23cbc ESP: efe23cb8
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: b6b2b000 CR3: 2d57e000 CR4: 000006f0
DR0: 00000000 DR1: 00000000 DR2: 00000000 DR3: 00000000
DR6: ffff0ff0 DR7: 00000400
Call Trace:
[<c0711c23>] lock_sock_nested+0x31/0xad
[<c074a9d2>] lock_sock+0xf/0x11
[<c074b8a1>] tcp_recvmsg+0x1a/0x84a
[<c071118a>] sock_common_recvmsg+0x36/0x4b
[<c070efe7>] __sock_recvmsg+0x56/0x60
[<c070f4ed>] sock_recvmsg+0xbe/0xd5
[<c045b4d5>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
[<c04f2e2b>] ? touch_atime+0xd2/0xeb
[<c0710558>] sys_recvfrom+0xc1/0x126
[<c04e0d98>] ? do_sync_read+0xae/0xe9
[<c045b4d5>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
[<c07105da>] sys_recv+0x1d/0x1f
[<c0710a85>] sys_socketcall+0x10d/0x195
[<c0487996>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0xff/0x114
[<c040905b>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x28

I submitted it and it says it went to the kernel and not to FIREFOX.  How sad 
it was a kernel oops and not a FIREFOX oops.  I beg to differ.  

Still despite not agreeing with everything in Fedora's philosophy, I do have to 
thank the KDE devs, Rex Dieter, Kevin Koffler, ... and others who I don't know 
for their work with KDE.  I have been happily using konqueror for a while (no 
flash, no proprietary stuff) just plain old konqueror the way Fedora and other 
distributions package it.  It would be great that more people give konqueror a 
chance and stop giving FIREFOX all of their divided supported.  It is not that 
great, it has grown but not getting better, just bigger and not leaner, maybe 
it needs to be put on a DIET.

\end{rant}

Regards,

Antonio 

P.S.
If you need to send this rant to /dev/null, you are welcome to do so.
Just remember that konqueror is THE ONE browser that deserves my respect and my 
loyalty.  If I need another browser, I will use Opera because it does not do 
bad things like firefox even though it is not OPEN SOURCE.   
Also,
I am a happy Fedora user since Fedora 2 and have used every version since at 
home and at work, I have found ways around my difficulties and the folks here 
have been tremdously helpful and have no regrets using it.  I am only 
disapointed in Firefox not Fedora.   


      
-- 
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

Reply via email to