Gilboa Davara wrote: > On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 20:30 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote: > >> In my case, none of the above... >> > > Oh, come on! > I'm using the same binary driver as you are. > And yes, nVidia binary driver, while -far- better than ATI's driver, has > had it's share of issues. > E.g. > - Initial F12 xorg + nVidia driver combo resulted in unbelievably slow > performance under KDE. > - Legacy driver releases tend to lag the "current" driver badly. In a > desktop, you could always switch to the latest version, but you laptop > still carries a GF5600M, you're more or less screwed. > - Xen kernel were never supported by nVidia. > - Having to compile a kernel without 4K stacks for months, until nVidia > added support for it. > > .... Again, nVidia is doing an admirable job at keeping their drivers > stable and current (compared to say, ATI or Intel Poulsbo), but claiming > the using them do not come at a price, is ridicules, at best. > > > I said, "in my case" none of the above. So, unless you know the details of "my case"....
-- Having to manually track the satellite.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
