On 01/30/2010 09:39 PM, Rod Haper wrote: > On 01/30/2010 07:03 PM, Mikkel wrote: >> On 01/30/2010 06:25 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> >>> Q? This code uses the 'sleep(1)' call to time its repeat scans. It is >>> using >>> no cpu as its the bottom item on an htop sorted by use report. >>> >>> I assume I can go into the tarball and change those 2 sleep calls to >>> sleep(0.05) to get 20 scans a second? I'm going to try it anyway & see if >>> it >>> will still build. >>> >> Nope - sleep only accepts an integer value. Using sleep, 1 second it >> the best you will get. >> >> Mikkel >> > > > He probably wants usleep() which sleeps for microsecond intervals. > > -- > Rod >
Or better yet nanosleep() which is more portable and up to date. -- Rod -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
