Hi Stipe,

In fact, I found the problem. It's related with the dlr-url from smsbox, I 
tried with opensmppbox and worked as required.

So, the number of connections and the time to response from the dlr-url
affects the number of sms sent by the sendsms command from smsbox. I'm not
sure why, since I reviewed the code and I didn't see any specific situation
there.

The problem? I don't understand at all what is the relationship between that
time to response from the dlr-url and the bearerbox to the SMSC delivery.

I checked too the SMSC side and it seems normal, now with opensmppbox worked
around 80 MPS (2 x 40 TPS).

Not sure how can I debug the smsbox part. I even checked the limits from the
server because the open connections by the cgi-bin/sendsms request part.

Thanks

On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 10:34:50AM +0200, Stipe Tolj wrote:
> Am 25.05.21, 22:52, schrieb Jose N Figueroa:
> > Hello everybody,
> > 
> > I'm using kannel latest revision  "Kannel bearerbox version svn-r5307M" with
> > the following scenario:
> > 
> > Smsbox ->  Bearerbox ->  SMPP SMSC·
> > 
> > I'm using redis as store, but for some strange reason I'm only getting out
> > about 5 sms/s and even I have 2 or 3 binds (load balancing) to the same SMPP
> > SMSC, I tried one smsc and the 3 smsc as load balancing already, same 
> > result.
> > 
> > This is the config, I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong:
> 
> the config itself looks ok, there is no major issue that you explain the 5
> TPS ratio.
> 
> My assumption here is that the SMSC side simply regulates your account (same
> username/system-id on the binds) to have a max ratio of 5 TPS.
> 
> Are you getting corresponding throttling errors back from the SMSC side? and
> what is the service response time (SRT) value, so the time difference
> between submit_sm and corresponding submit_sm_resp PDUs?
> 
> Stipe
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Stipe Tolj
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
> 
> Kannel Foundation                 tolj.org system architecture
> http://www.kannel.org/            http://www.tolj.org/
> 
> st...@kannel.org                  s...@tolj.org
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-- 
Jose N Figueroa

Reply via email to