Hi,

Time passed but my DLR problem is still here, and I've got now 2 kannel
servers for 3 modems, and the problem of the non-reliable "Delivered" DLRs
appears on the 3 modems...

I checked with Multitech support, and they seems to agree on the fact that
Kannel is making the problem here.

I sent them those 2 cases (one success / one failure):

the success one:

2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: <-- +CDS: 25
2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: <--
07913366003000F006220B913366930401F3715091014400807150910144008000
2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: received message from
SMSC: +33660003000 <+33%206%2060%2000%2030%2000>
*2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: got STATUS-REPORT for
message <34>:*
*2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: Numeric receiver
(international) <+33663940103 <+33%206%2063%2094%2001%2003>>*
*2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Looking for DLR
smsc=multic3, ts=34, dst=+33663940103 <+33%206%2063%2094%2001%2003>, type=1*
2017-05-19 12:43:59 [455] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: created DLR message for
URL <http://localhost/playsms/index.php?app=call&cat=gateway&plu
gin=kannel&access=dlr&type=%d&smslog_id=277&uid=2&smsc=multic3>
2017-05-19 12:44:01 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: TP-Validity-Period: 24.0
hours

and here is the failing one:

2017-05-19 12:47:47 [455] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Adding DLR
smsc=multic3, ts=39, src=1234, dst=+33614472199
<+33%206%2014%2047%2021%2099>, mask=31, boxc=
2017-05-19 12:47:47 [455] [6] DEBUG: SMSC[multic3]: creating DLR message
2017-05-19 12:47:47 [455] [6] DEBUG: SMSC[multic3]: DLR =
http://localhost/playsms/index.php?app=call&cat=gateway&pl
ugin=kannel&access=dlr&type=%d&smslog_id=545&uid=2&smsc=multic3
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: <-- +CDS: 25
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: <--
07913366003000F006250B913316442791F9715091018400807150910184008000
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: received message from
SMSC: +33660003000 <+33%206%2060%2000%2030%2000>
*2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: got STATUS-REPORT for
message <37>:*
*2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: Numeric receiver
(international) <+33614472199 <+33%206%2014%2047%2021%2099>>*
*2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Looking for DLR
smsc=multic3, ts=37, dst=+33614472199 <+33%206%2014%2047%2021%2099>, type=1*
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] WARNING: DLR[internal]:* DLR from
SMSC<multic3> for DST<+33614472199 <+33%206%2014%2047%2021%2099>> not
found.*
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic3]: *Received delivery
notification but can't find that ID in the DLR storage*
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] DEBUG:* System error 1: Operation not
permitted*
2017-05-19 12:47:50 [455] [6] ERROR: AT2[multic3]: *could not decode PDU to
a message*.

And here is the response from Multitech:
















*Your test 1:Module output following acknowledgement to application which
module received from
network:07913366003000F006250B913316442791F9715091018400807150910184008000Your
test 2:Module output following acknowledgement to application which module
received from
network:07913366003000F006220B913366930401F3715091014400807150910144008000Your
test 1 & 2When you look at modem output side by side structure is
identical07913366003000F006250B913316442791F971509101840080715091018400800007913366003000F006220B913366930401F3715091014400807150910144008000Per
Steve suggestion I used SMS application to interpret the acknowledgments
and it had no issues with either message. So it appears the error is not
due to the structure of the acknowledgment. See attached images
illustrating the messages are similar in structure and not in error. The
module forwards acknowledgements it receives from network to the
application when the messages arrive. Message received from network/output
to application appears to be structurally correct. This does not appear to
be a device/module issue but an issue with SMS software not finding a match
for acknowledgement being received from cellular network. This assessment
is based on log indicating "can't find that ID in the DLR storage." We are
not familiar with this software so we would suggest you ask SMS application
support why their application is not finding a match for acknowledgements
received from network in 40-60% of cases.*

So, how do I fix this wierd bug ? And also, how I'm the only one getting
this ?
Can anyone help me make the Delivered DLR works with Kannel ?

If it needs to change the source code of Kannel, I'm okay with that, but
just give me some hints on where I can find the bug in the source code.

Thanks,



*Hakim BIMAZGANE*
*Lead Developer*

Vit*alliance*


2016-10-20 18:16 GMT+02:00 Hakim Bimazgane <hakim.bimazg...@vitalliance.fr>:

> Hi,
>
> I'm using Kannel version 1.5.0 on a Debian x64 with PlaySMS 1.4.
> I use a MultiTech MultiConnect Cell 100 (MTC-H5-B03-KIT) as GSM modem.
>
> I got some problems with some DLRs (concatened SMS activated).
>
> I see on my app and on playSMS that I receive the "sent" status, but I got
> very rarely the "delivered" status.
>
> I don't know, but I think it's about errors I got after the +CDS command:
>
> 2016-10-20 17:23:37 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: detecting modem type
> 2016-10-20 17:23:37 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: opening device
> 2016-10-20 17:23:37 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: device opened. Telnet
> mode = 0
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: device opened
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: speed set to 115200
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ATZ^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- AT
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:38 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- AT
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT&F^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- AT&F
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:40 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ATE0^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- ATE0
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ATI^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- 332
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: found string <332>,
> using modem definition <Multitech>
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CSMS=?^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CSMS: (0,1)
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: Phase 2+ is supported
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: Closing device
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: opening device
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: device opened. Telnet
> mode = 0
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: device opened
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: Logging in
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: init device
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: speed set to 115200
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ATZ^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:41 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- AT
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT&F^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- AT&F
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ATE0^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- ATE0
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+IFC=2,2^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CPIN?^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CPIN: READY
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CSCA="
> +33660003000 <+33%206%2060%2000%2030%2000>"^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CMGF=0^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CSMS=?^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: -->
> AT+CSQ;+CGDCONT=1,"IP","mmsbouygtel.com";+CGSMS=2;+CNMI=2,2,
> 0,1,0;+CPMS="ME","ME","ME";#SGACTCFG=1,3,200^M
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CSMS: (0,1)
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] INFO: AT2[multic1]: AT SMSC successfully
> opened.
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CSQ: 12,0
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CPMS:
> "ME",100,100,"ME",100,100,"ME",100,100
> 2016-10-20 17:23:42 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: TP-Validity-Period:
> 24.0 hours
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> AT+CMGS=154^M
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <--
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- >
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: send command status: 1
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: -->
> 0071000B913387237263F70008A78C0500030003010050006F0073007400
> 65002000E000200070006F007500720076006F0069007200200070006F00
> 75007200200075006E002000320034006800200073007500720020003200
> 340020006300680065007A0020003100200070006500720073006F006E00
> 6E0065002000E2006700E9006500200064006F006D006900630069006C006900E90065
> 2016-10-20 17:27:23 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: --> ^Z
> 2016-10-20 17:27:25 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CMGS: 26
> 2016-10-20 17:27:25 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- OK
> 2016-10-20 17:27:25 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: send command status: 0
> 2016-10-20 17:27:25 [22525] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Adding DLR
> smsc=multic1, ts=26, src=1234, dst=+33783227367
> <+33%207%2083%2022%2073%2067>, mask=31, boxc=
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <-- +CDS: 25
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: <--
> 07913366003000F0060C0B913387237263F7610102715245806101027152558000
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: received message from
> SMSC: +33660003000 <+33%206%2060%2000%2030%2000>
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: got STATUS-REPORT for
> message <12>:
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: Numeric receiver
> (international) <+33783227367 <+33%207%2083%2022%2073%2067>>
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: DLR[internal]: Looking for DLR
> smsc=multic1, ts=12, dst=+33783227367 <+33%207%2083%2022%2073%2067>,
> type=1
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] WARNING: DLR[internal]: DLR from
> SMSC<multic1> for DST<+33783227367 <+33%207%2083%2022%2073%2067>> not
> found.
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: AT2[multic1]: Received delivery
> notification but can't find that ID in the DLR storage
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] DEBUG: System error 1: Operation not
> permitted
> 2016-10-20 17:27:26 [22525] [6] ERROR: AT2[multic1]: could not decode PDU
> to a message.
>
> I've read that there was this problem on the 1.4 version, but I'm on the
> 1.5...
>
> Any idea of the problem ?
>
> Thank you,
>
>
> *Hakim BIMAZGANE*
> *Lead Développeur*
>
> Vit*alliance*
> *              Service professionnel d'aide à domicile*
>

Reply via email to