queue does work as expected, FIFO you may create a second connection to the same SMSC for priority messages only, without load balancing between connections.
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:34 PM, ha...@aeon.pk <ha...@aeon.pk> wrote: > I haven't used fakesmsc. However, try throttling the speed of the > connection to 1 or 2 SMS/sec. > > On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Manuel García Cabrera < > mcabr...@contentamobile.com> wrote: > >> I'm trying to test it with fakesmsc. Do you know how to simulate a delay >> in the sending of the message? I'm having a hard time testing it this way >> because the queue empties way too fast. >> >> >> On 10/03/15 10:35, ha...@aeon.pk wrote: >> >> Perhaps I cannot point out the logic of why exactly this happens, since I >> discovered it only by doing. >> >> Also, another way is that if your main bulk is going via SQLBOX, then if >> you push a message via SMSBOX, it will get higher prio and gets on top of >> the queue. >> >> Plz try it to confirm, since I did it quite long time ago. >> >> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Manuel García Cabrera < >> mcabr...@contentamobile.com> wrote: >> >>> Really? But wouldn't that mean that it's not actually a queue? >>> >>> >>> On 10/03/15 10:19, ha...@aeon.pk wrote: >>> >>> If you insert a new message in the existing queue, it automatically gets >>> delivered before the queued ones. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Manuel García Cabrera < >>> mcabr...@contentamobile.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I'm trying to send prioritary messages when there already are many >>>> messages queued for sending. Suppose I have on SMSC with a 10.000 message >>>> queue, and I want the next message I queue to be sent before those 10.000 >>>> messages. Is that possible? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
