Look into 2015-01-17 8:10 GMT+03:00 Ammar Ali <ammarali3...@gmail.com>:
> Hey, > > I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total > RAM. > > So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? > Look into smsbox-max-pending variable. It's used in case you have temporary problems with smsbox connectivity to keep pending queue of MT/MO messages in the memory for each smsbox instance. So memory usage of bearerbox would depend on this variable pretty much * on the number of connected smsbox/sqlbox instances. If you want to learn more about it read user guide. > > > > > > > *Ammar Ali* > > *Framp Technologies* > *Pune (Maharashtra)* > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas <r...@krishnasoft.in> wrote: > >> Hi Everyone, >> >> with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram & 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps >> ILL. >> I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ >> tps each >> >> My Settings: >> >> >> 1. SMS APP >> SQLBOX >> Bearerbox >> 2. Kannel & sql box log level >=3 >> 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 >> 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. >> 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 >> 6. Mysql 5.5 >> 7. Centos 6.6 >> 8. 1 Sqlbox >> 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel & sqlbox >> >> >> With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. >> >> >> I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. >> >> Sqlbox performance > Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open >> mysql ,run query & close connection. >> >> >> >> *Rajeev Krishna* >> >> Operations Manager >> Krishnas Software Technologies >> www.krishnasoft.in >> mobile :+91 888 5815 888 >> Sales :+91 888 5813 888 >> Support :+91 888 5817 888 >> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali <ammarali3...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi David Szanto, >>> >>> I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. >>> >>> This is the my configuration: >>> >>> *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBox----Multiple SMSC (Fake)* >>> >>> >>> But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. >>> >>> >>> *Ammar Ali* >>> *Framp Technology* >>> *Pune (Maharashtra)* >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto <dsza...@genasys.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ammar! >>>> I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and >>>> SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. >>>> Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox >>>> instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top >>>> distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even >>>> be set on separate machines. >>>> >>>> Ideally, something like: >>>> >>>> Application+SMSBOX ----> Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) ----> SMSC >>>> >>>> >>>> Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience >>>> it was MySQL. >>>> >>>> Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it >>>> gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in >>>> queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) >>>> >>>> Hope this helps >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> David Szanto >>>> >>>> El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: >>>> >>>> Hello Everyone, >>>> >>>> I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was >>>> started kannel then tested my application, it shows me >>>> 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max >>>> messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above >>>> 300. >>>> >>>> Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system >>>> setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance >>>> >>>> >>>> *Ammar Ali* >>>> *Framp Technology* >>>> *Pune (Maharashtra)* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke < >>>> christopher.bu...@simulity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hey, >>>>> >>>>> If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want >>>>> to look at a testbed. Check out >>>>> https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP >>>>> implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB >>>>> RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. >>>>> Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening >>>>> (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo >>>>> dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. >>>>> >>>>> On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 >>>>> msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but >>>>> admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with >>>>> ch-smpp more now. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com >>>>> Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 >>>>> Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 >>>>> Skype:krslynx >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, >>>>> Parc Menai, Bangor, >>>>> Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, >>>>> Wales, UK >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *Malaysia *Level 30, >>>>> The Gardens North Tower, >>>>> Mid Valley City, >>>>> Lingkaran Syed Putra, >>>>> 59200, Kuala Lumpur, >>>>> Malaysia >>>>> >>>>> NOTICE: This message contains privileged & confidential information >>>>> intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the >>>>> intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must >>>>> not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have >>>>> received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. >>>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender >>>>> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of >>>>> Simulity >>>>> Labs >>>>> >>>>> On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem ( >>>>> mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi >>>>> >>>>> Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second >>>>> with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and >>>>> the allowed TPS from the operator. >>>>> On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, "Ammar Ali" <ammarali3...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD >>>>>> but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. >>>>>> >>>>>> "Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', >>>>>> compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release >>>>>> 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine >>>>>> x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using >>>>>> OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL >>>>>> 5.6.22. Using native malloc." >>>>>> >>>>>> One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has >>>>>> been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me >>>>>> where the problem in my whole system. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is my whole setup: >>>>>> >>>>>> [Bearerbox]<----->[SQLBox]<----->[SMSBox]<---->[Fake SMSC >>>>>> (Multiple)] >>>>>> >>>>>> *Configurations:* >>>>>> *Kannel.conf* >>>>>> >>>>>> # Single Group "CORE" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = core >>>>>> admin-port = "13000" >>>>>> admin-port-ssl="no" >>>>>> admin-password = "*******" >>>>>> status-password = "*******" >>>>>> admin-deny-ip="*.*.*.*" >>>>>> admin-allow-ip="*.*.*.*" >>>>>> smsbox-interface ="127.0.0.1" >>>>>> smsbox-port = "13001" >>>>>> smsbox-port-ssl="no" >>>>>> log-file = "kannel.log" >>>>>> log-level = "0" >>>>>> access-log = "access.access" >>>>>> dlr-storage = "internal" >>>>>> sms-incoming-queue-limit = "-1" >>>>>> sms-outgoing-queue-limit = "1000000" >>>>>> smsbox-max-pending = "100" >>>>>> sms-resend-freq = "60" >>>>>> sms-resend-retry = "-1" >>>>>> >>>>>> # Single Group "smsbox" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = smsbox >>>>>> smsbox-id = "mysmsbox" >>>>>> bearerbox-host = "127.0.0.1" >>>>>> bearerbox-port = "13001" >>>>>> sendsms-port = "13010" >>>>>> log-file = "smsbox.log" >>>>>> log-level = "0" >>>>>> access-log="saccess.access" >>>>>> sendsms-chars = "0123456789+ " >>>>>> >>>>>> # Multi Group "SMSC" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = smsc >>>>>> smsc = fake >>>>>> smsc-id = smsc1 >>>>>> host="localhost" >>>>>> port = 10001 >>>>>> throughput="1000000.00" >>>>>> connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 >>>>>> reroute-dlr=true >>>>>> log-file="mysmsc1.log" >>>>>> log-level=0 >>>>>> allowed-smsc-id="smsc1" >>>>>> denied-smsc-id="smsc2" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = smsc >>>>>> smsc = fake >>>>>> smsc-id = smsc2 >>>>>> host="localhost" >>>>>> port = 10002 >>>>>> throughput="5000.00" >>>>>> connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 >>>>>> reroute-dlr=true >>>>>> log-file="mysmsc2.log" >>>>>> log-level=0 >>>>>> allowed-smsc-id="smsc2" >>>>>> denied-smsc-id="smsc1" >>>>>> >>>>>> # Multi Group "smsbox-route" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = smsbox-route >>>>>> smsbox-id = "mysmsbox" >>>>>> smsc-id = "smsc1" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = smsbox-route >>>>>> smsbox-id = "mysmsbox" >>>>>> smsc-id = "smsc2" >>>>>> >>>>>> # Multi Group "sms-service" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = sms-service >>>>>> keyword = default >>>>>> text = "No service specified" >>>>>> accept-x-kannel-headers = true >>>>>> concatenation = true >>>>>> catch-all = true >>>>>> >>>>>> # Multi Group "sendsms-user" >>>>>> >>>>>> group = sendsms-user >>>>>> name = "mysendsmsuser1" >>>>>> username = "tester1" >>>>>> password = "tester1" >>>>>> max-messages="10" >>>>>> >>>>>> *sqlbox.conf* >>>>>> >>>>>> # SQLBox Configuraton >>>>>> >>>>>> group = sqlbox >>>>>> id = sqlbox-db >>>>>> smsbox-id = "mysqlbox" >>>>>> global-sender = "" >>>>>> bearerbox-host = "localhost" >>>>>> bearerbox-port = "13001" >>>>>> smsbox-port = "13002" >>>>>> smsbox-port-ssl = "false" >>>>>> sql-log-table = "sent_sms" >>>>>> sql-insert-table = "send_sms" >>>>>> log-file = "sqlbox.log" >>>>>> log-level = "0" >>>>>> >>>>>> # Example MYSQL Connection >>>>>> >>>>>> group = mysql-connection >>>>>> id = sqlbox-db >>>>>> host="127.0.0.1" >>>>>> port = "3306" >>>>>> username = "**********" >>>>>> password = "**********" >>>>>> database = "**********" >>>>>> max-connections = "10" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC through SSH from my computer. Is >>>>>> there any problem? Thanks in advance. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Ammar Ali >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, John alero <johnale...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Dear Ammar, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As per Kannel part you can send only 300 to 500 SMS in a second, >>>>>>> if you want to send 1000 SMS in a second use twice setup for the same >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> hardware case Kannel not require high configuration server. If you have >>>>>>> used 4 GB RAM as well as 8 Core you will send the 300 to 500 TPS in a >>>>>>> second. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ammar Ali <ammarali3...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Hi* *Willy Mularto,* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have so many confusion regarding this. So can you describe any >>>>>>>> particular hardware configuration for getting this sms traffic? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ammar Ali >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Murgor Bendon < >>>>>>>> bendonmur...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your >>>>>>>>> connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. >>>>>>>>> Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>>>>> *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. >>>>>>>>> *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 >>>>>>>>> Twitter: @bendonmurgor <http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI < >>>>>>>>> kariuk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hey Willy, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any entry level benchmark? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto < >>>>>>>>>> sangpr...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy >>>>>>>>>>> the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali < >>>>>>>>>>> ammarali3...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 >>>>>>>>>>>> message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What >>>>>>>>>>>> will be >>>>>>>>>>>> server hardware configuration? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ammar Ali >>>>>>>>>>>> FRAMP Technologies, >>>>>>>>>>>> Pune (Maharashtra) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
