Hi
You can modify sqlbox and change the LIMIT X parameter on the reading
statement to adjust the number of records to move to kannel on each loop.
Note that this will increase the throughput from sqlbox to bearerbox; it
will not change the smsc throughput.
Regards
Alvaro
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS
y GPRS online
Visitenos en www.perusms.com
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 1:26 AM, Aditya Khanna <aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> Currently, I'm testing my application with Fake SMSC Connections.
>
> One more thing I'm facing a problem regarding sqlbox tables.
>
> When I'm inserting message into send_sms table then sqlbox inserts all
> records in sent_sms table. I'm analysing, it is too low (10-20
> message/second). So how to increase this.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Aditya Khanna
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 3:49 PM, spameden <spame...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-03 12:57 GMT+03:00 Aditya Khanna <aditya.khanna111...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello Everyone,
>>>
>>> I'm successfully configured Kannel with Bearerbox, SMSBox, SQLBox and
>>> some SMPP Ports (Using Fake SMSC's).
>>>
>>>
>>> Now the problem is that When I'm sending 5000 messages through HTTP then
>>> it is show in queue of SMSC.
>>> I'm generating one more request of single message through HTTP.
>>>
>>
>> Try using sqlbox instead with priority field (alter sqlbox source to
>> include ORDER by priority field) and INSERT messages with higher priority
>> (e.g. = 0)
>>
>> Example:
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8458566/implementing-priority-queue-in-kannel
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Now the problem is that this single message is also in proceeding queue.
>>>
>>> So, how to manage this type of issue with Kannel. How to send this
>>> message to a free SMSC port.
>>>
>>
>> You can always specify free SMSC uplink with: &smsc_id=XXXX via HTTP call
>> or use smsc_id in sqlbox send_sms table.
>>
>> For higher throughput read about max-pending-submits as well as consult
>> your upstream SMSC operator.
>>
>>>
>>> Please share your valuable suggestions.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Aditya Khanna
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
