Hi

It does happen with some phones when your phone memory/sim is full. In
those phones, it fails to report smsc that it received the "last" sms that
fits its memory; therefore smsc never receives the delivered PDU, and thus
kannel retries until it expires. This usually happens when storing sms on
SIM.
Try to delete some sms from phone memory and sim.

Regards

Alvaro



|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier
celular y Nextel
en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS
y GPRS online
              Visitenos en www.perusms.com

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:38 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa <
tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Have you tried latest kannel from svn?
>
> Sent from my Windows Phone
> ------------------------------
> From: Amir Mahmoud <amir.mahm...@egyptlinx.com>
> Sent: 27-11-2014 01:21
> To: users <users@kannel.org>
> Subject: Same Sequence Number for many PDUs
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> I'm facing abnormal behavior with my kannel (1.4.4) installed on CentOS 7,
>
> I have found that when i submit SMS to my number and after receiving it on
> my handset that kannel still keeps the sms on the store trying to re-submit
> it again and again to the SMSC and with each attempt i receive it again on
> my handset and finally after finishing the retrials kannel log it with
> status DISCARD !!!!
>
> I have set the bearerbox in debug mode and found that kannel already sent
> "submit_sm" successfully PDU but it didn't receive "submit_sm_resp" and i
> think this is the reason behind keeping it in the store and discard it.
>
> So, i have taken tcp dump and found that both "submit_sm" PDU and
> "submit_sm_resp" already sent but i can't understand why kannel didn't
> handle it Also i have found unusual thing while checking the dump, i found
> that many PDUs are having the "sequence number" ("Enquire_Link" &
> "Submit_SM")
>
> Is that normal and why kannel is doing so ?
>
> Regards,
> Amir
>

Reply via email to