Hi Nikos, [ You should use mailer which support mailing lists ]
On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 18:37, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > Hi Milan, > > I did submit a patch a while ago to use relative instead of absolute > time, but was rejected, since a lot of SMScs do not support relative > time, only absolute. I remember but because I don't need relative validity I didn't tried your patch and I forgot to mention it to Hamza. I'm not against your patch but again I don't need it so I don't care. > 2 solutions to this: Calculate the remote time from the application > and use this validity for kannel (may not always work if timezone > time is less than localtime), or make it configurable, provided that > the SMSc supports relative time. > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Milan P. Stanic" > <m...@arvanta.net> > To: <users@kannel.org> > Sent: Friday, May 13, 2011 1:58 PM > Subject: Re: Silent SMS > > > >On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 15:38, ha...@aeon.pk wrote: > >>Well, the validity parameter is another issue with me, since my > >>application > >>server is on different timezone, and kannel sends absolute timestamp > >>(2011-05-12 13:01:01) as validity parameter instead of relative timestamp > >>(expiry time = current/submission time+60 secs). I don't seem to find the > >>resolution of it as well, so I have stopped using the validity > >>period thing. > >>Any resolution to this? > > > >I looked in smsc_smpp.c and it does not seems that it is to complicated > >to change it to use relative instead of absolute time. But I cannot test > >it because I do not have any environment where I could play with it. > > > >>On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 12:59, ha...@aeon.pk wrote: > >>> > Thanks Mads. I already tried this, but the problem that I am > >>facing > > is > >>> that > >>> > the app needs to read the DLR sent by SMSC. SMSC sends > > > >>'DLR=Delivered' if > >>> > the handset is on. But SMSC does not send any DLR at all if > >>the > > handset > >>> is > >>> > off or out of coverage. Thats the only issue I am having. > >>Any > > solution > >>> for > >>> > this? > >>> > >>> Did you tried to put validity parameter with short time (1 minute)? > >>> I'm using pid=64 for (so called) SMS Push and SMSC responds with > >>> Absent_subscriber code in case it cannot deliver message to subscriber. > >>> > >>> > Also, can I get the table for the all possible values of PID > >>and what > > can > >>> we > >>> > do playing around with them? Thanks! > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Mads N. Vestergaard > > > >><m...@coolsms.com > >>> >wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Hi Hamza, > >>> > > > >>> > > You can send a SMS with a special PID to generate a silent SMS. > >>> > > > >>> > > We are adding pid=64 to the HTTP request, to do this. > >>> > > > >>> > > But please be aware that not all gateways supports this. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > > >>> > > Mads > >>> > > > >>> > > Den 13/05/2011 kl. 09.51 skrev ha...@aeon.pk: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Dear friends, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > How to send a silent SMS via kannel? My purpose is to check the > >>> status of > >>> > > the mobile (ON/OFF) without bothering the customer by any > >>> > > pop-up/SMS > >>> > > messages. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Regards, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Hamza > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Kind regards, Milan > >>> -------------------------------------------------- > >>> Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > >>> Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > >>> > >>> > > > >-- > >Kind regards, Milan > >-------------------------------------------------- > >Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net > >Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code. > > > -- Kind regards, Milan -------------------------------------------------- Arvanta, IT Security http://www.arvanta.net Please do not send me e-mail containing HTML code.
