Thanks to everybody. About proposed solutions I realized the "throughput" parameter does not work (specially when there is small traffic). Instead, I used fake smsc connections with same id and it works. Anyway I suggest a new option "weigth" on smsc group should be useful. Also because with fake smsc configured the bbox has multiple threads trying to establish a connection and this is not really good.
Regards Pino -----Original Message----- From: users-boun...@vm1.kannel.org [mailto:users-boun...@vm1.kannel.org] On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj Sent: giovedì 3 marzo 2011 18.58 Cc: us...@vm1.kannel.org Subject: Re: SMSC Balancing Am 03.03.2011 12:42, schrieb Luca Agostini: > Hello, in my bearerbox I have 2 smsc connection set. Is there a way to > configure > MT traffic with different balancing weights? > > Now it works with 50%-50% traffic balancing between smsc. Is it possible have > 80%-20%? Nop, we don't have such explicit weight for balancing in fact. But, we can add this I guess relatively simple. I was afraid that we need a strate control here, in order to "know" how much traffic was passed way A, and then decide about the other route B. But that's not necessary in fact. While the MT routing is done in bearerbox, we end up in a "step 3" with a set of smsc-ids where we will have to choose among one. Here is where we pick a random one among all candidates. So it's a 1/N chance to go a specific way. We can introduce a config directive here for the 'group = smsc' context that allows defining a weight, from 0-1 that will be taken into account. Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
