Thanks for your help but in doxygen cross-reference i could not found any 
function in gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c from gw-prioqueue.c file but in download 
version 
of kannel named gateway-1.4.3 i found functions name gw_prioqueue_create() in 
file gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c. I don't know why its not mentioned in 
cross-reference. 


Any ways it means that kannel is maintain priority queue. but if its a 
bearerbox 
thing then why its not in bearerbox.c i mean how bearerbox is maintaining the 
sms comming from smsbox with priority 3so please tell me if i send an push 
message with priority=3 in URL then how kannel works how it deal this message 
tell me the process from smsbox to the delivery of this sms on mobile with 
priority maintenance.



________________________________
From: Alejandro Guerrieri <alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com>
To: adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com>
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 4:34:29 PM
Subject: Re: Need kind help in Implementation of priority queue


You won't find any references on smsbox. It's a bearerbox thing (the queueing 
is 
implemented on the SMSC drivers themselves).
Check gwlib/gw-prioqueue.* for the queue implementation.

You'll see it's used on each driver supporting it:
gw/smsc/smsc_at.c
gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c

gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c


You can check the doxygen cross-reference for further information about how all 
those components are related to each other:

http://doxygen.kannel.org/

Hope it helps,

Alex


On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:43 AM, adil nazir <adil_nazi...@yahoo.com> wrote:

Can anyone help me in finding the implementation of sendsms in SMSBOX i mean if 
i have following URL:
>
>     
>"http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=tester&password=foobar&text=hello&priority=3&to=+123456789";;
>
>
>then i want to know how kannel deal with priority=3 in kannel. Its handling it 
>in smsbox.c file or in bearerbox.c file. This URL will tell tell smsbox about 
>the priority or its telling bearerbox about this priority. In both cases how 
>kannel  handles it in code. 
>
>
>Adil Nazir
>
>



      

Reply via email to