Hi Konstantin, And you use ..&smsc=<CONN_NAME>? I tired this too but didn't work for me.
Cheers. On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Konstantin Vayner <pon...@appcell.net>wrote: > I actually prefer using "allowed-smsc-id" (set to self - or name you give > to group of smscs that should be balanced between...) in such cases, > especially when there are a lot of links defined > > Regards, > Konstantin > > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Latitude Berlin <latitude.de@ > googlemail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have configured kannel to send SMS via SMPP with 2 groups defined. As I >> understand, Kannel does load balancing itself and choses one of the >> configured to send out SMS. >> >> I am sending bulk of messages and want to use only connection1. I did this >> the following way: >> >> >> kannel.conf >> --------------------------- >> # SMSC SMPP >> group = smsc >> smsc = smpp >> smsc-id = conn1 >> ... >> denied-smsc-id = conn2 >> >> # SMSC SMPP >> group = smsc >> smsc = smpp >> smsc-id = conn2 >> >> >> >> ... >> denied-smsc-id = conn1 >> >> >> HTTP send req: >> -------------------- >> ...&smsc=conn1 >> >> My question is that whether denied-smsc-id … is really required? If I don't >> add this, I see kannel ignoring my ...&smsc=conn1request and crossing the >> SMSC group itself. >> Regards. >> >> >
